2020
DOI: 10.4236/ijaa.2020.103013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Kaali Impact as Trigger of a Mega-Tsunami Event and Violent Seismotectonics in Sweden

Abstract: A meteorite impacted the ground in Estonia forming the Kaali Crater dated at 1183-1162 BC. It set up a Baltic-wide mega-tsunami dated at 1171 absolute varve years BC. It also triggered violent seismotectonic effect in Sweden. Ancient legends testify of direct observations of the sky phenomena and personal experiences of the ground shaking and tsunami flooding, which makes the Kaali Crater the oldest impact event documented by humans. The Ragnarök apocalypse is likely to lead its origin from the violent geodyna… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…yrs BP. This means full agreement with previous records [7] [8] [10] [11] [24] and time coincidence with the Kaali impact in Estonia [10] [11]. It also worked as the incitement of the Enköping-Bålsta investigation here presented.…”
Section: The Lake Mälaren Valleysupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…yrs BP. This means full agreement with previous records [7] [8] [10] [11] [24] and time coincidence with the Kaali impact in Estonia [10] [11]. It also worked as the incitement of the Enköping-Bålsta investigation here presented.…”
Section: The Lake Mälaren Valleysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Tsunami events with a date of about 3000 BP or 1200 cal. yrs BC, have been reported from Umeå [2] [21], Hudiksvall [2] [8] [22], Forsmark [7] [8] [23], Upplands Väsby [24], Enköping (this paper; [10] [11], Eskilstuna (this paper), Saltsjöbaden [11], Åker (this paper, [2] [3] [25]), Södertörn [11] [22] [26], and Tystberga [11] [22] as shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations