The junior-junior team

Rice, Cecil A.

doi:10.1007/bf01458228

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 26 publications

(17 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Using a convenience sample of 22 junior-junior coleaders (11 dyads) from a single training institution, C. A. Rice (1995) explored their perceptions of the training experience. Respondents identified their coleadership experience as both a positive and valuable mechanism for learning group skills.…”

Section: Dyad Structurementioning

confidence: 99%

Group Coleadership: A Critical Review

Luke

Hackney

2007

Couns Edu & Supervision

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A review of group literature, much of which is anecdotal or theoretical, revealed that coleadership has been a common practice in training and therapeutic settings for well over 50 years. Careful examination of group practice reveals a surprisingly small amount of empirical evidence to support what apparently is a widely practiced method for the training of group leaders. However, the anecdotal support of group coleader practice is impressive if not convincing. That scholarly work is summarized in this article, and research implications for coleader practice are discussed as they relate to counselor preparation.

show abstract

Section: Dyad Structurementioning

confidence: 99%

Group Coleadership: A Critical Review

Luke

Hackney

2007

Couns Edu & Supervision

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Exploratory Findings on Novice Group Counselors’ Initial Co-facilitating Experiences in In-Class Support Groups With Adjunct Online Support Groups

Kit

Wong

D’Rozario

et al. 2014

The Journal for Specialists in Group Work

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Systematic Program to Enhance Clinician Group Skills in an Inpatient Psychiatric Hospital

Burlingame

Earnshaw

Hoag

et al. 2002

International Journal of Group Psychotherapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article describes the collaborative effort of a team of discipline directors, administrators, and academicians to create a systematic program to enhance the group competencies of a large clinical staff working at a state hospital. The effects of the program were tested by a quasi-experimental field study. Quantitative measures of group process provided limited support for program effectiveness. Stronger support came from qualitative inquiry. The development and effectiveness of the program is examined within a larger context of group programs housed in large health care organizations.

show abstract

The junior-junior team

Cited by 3 publications

References 26 publications

Group Coleadership: A Critical Review

Group Coleadership: A Critical Review

Exploratory Findings on Novice Group Counselors’ Initial Co-facilitating Experiences in In-Class Support Groups With Adjunct Online Support Groups

A Systematic Program to Enhance Clinician Group Skills in an Inpatient Psychiatric Hospital

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About