2013
DOI: 10.1521/pedi_2012_26_062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: The objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Invalidating Childhood Environment Scale (ICES; Mountford, Corstorphine, Tomlinson, & Waller, 2004), a measure designed to retrospectively assess exposure to parental invalidation. The ICES was administered to a sample of female college students along with measures of parental bonding and borderline personality disorder (BPD) symptomatology. In contrast with previous findings, the ICES demonstrated excellent internal consistency with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
26
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The maternal and paternal subscales can be combined to reflect a combined ‘parental invalidation’ by obtaining the mean of the two total subscale scores. The ICES has demonstrated excellent internal consistency in a non‐clinical sample (Robertson, Kimbrel, & Nelson‐Gray, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maternal and paternal subscales can be combined to reflect a combined ‘parental invalidation’ by obtaining the mean of the two total subscale scores. The ICES has demonstrated excellent internal consistency in a non‐clinical sample (Robertson, Kimbrel, & Nelson‐Gray, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hay que tener en cuenta que Mountford trabajó con una muestra no clínica de solo 62 individuos. En el estudio de Robertson et al (2013), en cambio, se empleó una muestra más numerosa pero solo de mujeres (212). Observaron niveles medios de invalidación menores a los encontrados en la muestra argentina, con puntajes mayores de invalidación paterna que materna.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Mientras que Sturrock et al (2009) reportaron también valores bajos del coeficiente alfa; 0,59 para la invalidación materna y 0,67 para la invalidación paterna. En cambio, Robertson et al (2013) encontraron niveles de consistencia interna similares a los observados en nuestra muestra. Adicionalmente, en el estudio piloto se aplicó el instrumento en dos ocasiones separadas por dos semanas.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Among non-clinical samples of eating disorders, on the other hand, internal consistency was found to be less reliable, with alpha coefficients ranging from 0.53 to 0.67 [31,34]. However, good internal consistency was reported among a nonclinical sample evaluated for BPD (0.88-0.90) thereby providing the first psychometrically sound evidence for this measure among clinical and nonclinical samples Robertson et al [35] also found good concurrent validity for the ICES with BPD samples, whereby all six subscales of the ICES positively correlated with borderline symptoms. The ICES-A used for this study is currently in the process of validation, but initial psychometric data for this sample suggest adequate internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha at .80 for the paternal invalidation scale and at 0.91 for the maternal invalidation scale.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%