2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The interaction between working and reference spatial memories in rats on a radial maze

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Formal demonstrations of the interaction between habit and recently formed memory are found in primate experiments with humans (Hay & Jacoby, 1996;Jacoby, 1991;Jacoby et al, 1992) and monkeys (Tu & Hampton, 2013;Tu et al, 2011). Guitar and Roberts (2014) have reported evidence of similar WM and RM interaction in rat spatial memory. The experiments reported here now extend the interaction between WM and RM to birds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Formal demonstrations of the interaction between habit and recently formed memory are found in primate experiments with humans (Hay & Jacoby, 1996;Jacoby, 1991;Jacoby et al, 1992) and monkeys (Tu & Hampton, 2013;Tu et al, 2011). Guitar and Roberts (2014) have reported evidence of similar WM and RM interaction in rat spatial memory. The experiments reported here now extend the interaction between WM and RM to birds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Reference memory represents knowledge for aspects of a task that remain constant between trials and requires memory consolidation, involving specific mechanisms. In contrast, working memory is only useful within each trial, do not need to be consolidated for use in future trials and involves therefore different mechanisms (Kitajima et al, 1992;Guitar and Roberts, 2015;Roberts et al, 2016). As an example of the differential mechanisms involved, it can be mentioned, for example, that mice lacking the GluN2A subunit exhibit impaired spatial working memory but normal spatial reference memory (Bannerman et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Similarly, the novel objective recognition test revealed impairment in long-rather than short-term object recognition in LARGE KD mice ( Figure 7D ). Working memory is hippocampus-dependent ( Dillon et al, 2008 ) but does not require consolidation ( Guitar and Roberts, 2015 ). Hence, the intact spatial working memory and short-term memory observed in this study strongly suggest that hippocampal LARGE KD specifically affects hippocampus-dependent, consolidation-requiring processes essential for memory stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%