2019
DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1685033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The inter-rater reliability of the 13-point manual muscle test in people with spinal cord injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used this rather than more sophisticated dynamometers because we needed an outcome measure that was easy to administer and was readily interpretable. We acknowledge that the 13-point manual muscle test is less objective than dynamometry but it has clear validity and contrary to what is often assumed, it is surprisingly reliable when used by trained therapists [24]. The precision of our estimate confirms this.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used this rather than more sophisticated dynamometers because we needed an outcome measure that was easy to administer and was readily interpretable. We acknowledge that the 13-point manual muscle test is less objective than dynamometry but it has clear validity and contrary to what is often assumed, it is surprisingly reliable when used by trained therapists [24]. The precision of our estimate confirms this.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This scale was adapted from the traditional six-point manual muscle test with pluses and minuses, and has been recently tested for reliability. The weighted kappa coefficient (95% confidence interval (CI)) reflecting the agreement between the two strength assessments by two different assessors for the wrist extensors and elbow flexors were 0.96 (0.93 to 0.99) and 0.94 (0.89 to 0.99), respectively [24]. A between-group difference of 1 point on the 13-point scale was set as the minimally worthwhile treatment effect prior to the commencement of the trial.…”
Section: Muscle Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MMT for bicep brachii of affected arm was performed with the patient in the lying position [ 31 ]. The MMT score was transformed to 0-12 scale according to the previous study (i.e., 5 score would transform to 12, 5- to 11, 4 to 10, and so forth) [ 32 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muscular strength can be assessed in various ways. Common laboratory techniques are the manual muscle test [ 4 , 5 , 6 ], isokinetic dynamometry [ 7 , 8 , 9 ], and isometric dynamometry [ 10 , 11 , 12 ]. The manual muscle test is widely used because it is fast and inexpensive, but it delivers low accuracy and sensitivity [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%