2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influential Bony Factors and Vectors for Predicting Soft Tissue Responses After Orthognathic Surgery in Mandibular Prognathism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For their part, Tiwari et al (2018), analyzing 3D photos obtained 12 months after orthognathic surgery, showed a relation between 1 mm of maxillary advancement with increase in average of 1.81º in the nasolabial angle and between 1 mm of maxillary regression related to a decrease of 2.73º in this angle. Han & Lee (2018), in a retrospective study where they analyzed patients who underwent orthognathic surgery, reported a direct relation between the rotation of the occlusal plane and the nasolabial angle, considering that for every degree of clockwise rotation of the occlusal plane, there is an average increase of 1.35º in the nasolabial angle. Labial dynamics were not assessed in these studies, determining that most of these relations are established at rest and not smiling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For their part, Tiwari et al (2018), analyzing 3D photos obtained 12 months after orthognathic surgery, showed a relation between 1 mm of maxillary advancement with increase in average of 1.81º in the nasolabial angle and between 1 mm of maxillary regression related to a decrease of 2.73º in this angle. Han & Lee (2018), in a retrospective study where they analyzed patients who underwent orthognathic surgery, reported a direct relation between the rotation of the occlusal plane and the nasolabial angle, considering that for every degree of clockwise rotation of the occlusal plane, there is an average increase of 1.35º in the nasolabial angle. Labial dynamics were not assessed in these studies, determining that most of these relations are established at rest and not smiling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soft tissue surface distances were calculated by observing point-to-point correspondence. For each patient, ten soft tissue lateral landmarks [9,11,12] were obtained in the coordinate y (anteroposterior direction) and z (superoinferior direction) [15] (Table 1). In relation to accuracy, the distances from the soft tissue surface were considered positive if they were in the downward direction vertically and under-predicted anteroposteriorly.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in soft tissues after bimaxillary surgery are multifactorial and rely on factors related to the surgery (magnitude and direction of bone movements) [2,9] and the patient (age, ethnicity, skin type, fat deposit, and orofacial muscle tone) [2,10]. There are few studies that assess factors inherent to the patient (e.g., sex and age) [11,12] and further investigations has been recommended for predicting the soft tissue response [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%