2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1387-3806(02)00723-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of the trapping potential on the attachment of a second electron to stored metal cluster and fullerene anions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the reduced dianion signal at m / z = 42.5, the dianion signal at m / z = 66.5 ͑C 11 2− with one 13 C without flooding͒ was about a factor of 4 more intense for additional toluene flooding. This might suggest a superimposed contribution by 12 C 11 1 H 2− . On one occasion, surprisingly, a weak dianion signal at m / z = 40.5 ͑Fig.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to the reduced dianion signal at m / z = 42.5, the dianion signal at m / z = 66.5 ͑C 11 2− with one 13 C without flooding͒ was about a factor of 4 more intense for additional toluene flooding. This might suggest a superimposed contribution by 12 C 11 1 H 2− . On one occasion, surprisingly, a weak dianion signal at m / z = 40.5 ͑Fig.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After switching off the electron beam, the clusters remain for another second in the electron bath to create further dianions. The number of dianions produced depends on the initial number of stored monoanions, the applied trapping potential [55], and the experimental parameters related to the electron bath, e.g. duration and energy of the applied electron beam as well as the amount of argon gas pulsed into the trap volume.…”
Section: Dianion Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dianion stability is expected to increase with cage size and, indeed, C 70 2ÿ was also detected along with C 60 2ÿ in the original mass spectrometry observation [10,11]. It has subsequently been produced by electrospray [14] and by electron attachment to C 70 ÿ in a Penning trap [15], as well as by charge transfer very recently [13]. However, an electrostatic model estimate suggested that C 70 2ÿ is not stable against autodetachment and possesses a negative binding energy for the second electron on the order of ÿ 0:28 eV [16,17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%