2022
DOI: 10.3390/s22113972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of the sEMG Amplitude Estimation Technique on the EMG–Force Relationship

Abstract: The estimation of the sEMG–force relationship is an open problem in the scientific literature; current methods show different limitations and can achieve good performance only on limited scenarios, failing to identify a general solution to the optimization of this kind of analysis. In this work, this relationship has been estimated on two different datasets related to isometric force-tracking experiments by calculating the sEMG amplitude using different fixed-time constant moving-window filters, as well as an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cut-off frequency of 2.0 Hz was used in our study for envelope estimation. The sEMG amplitude during isometric and quasi-static contractions was shown to have a frequency below 5-10 Hz, and the optimal cut-off frequencies between 2-3 Hz were provided in the literature (Staudenmann et al, 2010;Ranaldi et al, 2022). Such a cut-off frequency compromises sEMG dynamics, muscle force difference, and the time lag between those signals (Staudenmann et al, 2010).…”
Section: The Performance Of the Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cut-off frequency of 2.0 Hz was used in our study for envelope estimation. The sEMG amplitude during isometric and quasi-static contractions was shown to have a frequency below 5-10 Hz, and the optimal cut-off frequencies between 2-3 Hz were provided in the literature (Staudenmann et al, 2010;Ranaldi et al, 2022). Such a cut-off frequency compromises sEMG dynamics, muscle force difference, and the time lag between those signals (Staudenmann et al, 2010).…”
Section: The Performance Of the Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a cut-off frequency compromises sEMG dynamics, muscle force difference, and the time lag between those signals (Staudenmann et al, 2010). Different cut-off frequencies could affect the smoothness resulting in correlations among estimated sEMG amplitude and any target signal, especially in non-slowly varying signals (Ranaldi et al, 2022). Moreover, non-causal digital filters were used in our study.…”
Section: The Performance Of the Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the force of an isometric contraction is gradually increased, the number of active motor unit increases, larger units are progressively recruited (Henneman et al 1965), and already recruited units increase their firing rate (Milner-Brown et al 1973;Desmedt and Godaux 1978). Therefore, the overall amplitude of the sEMG signal increases with increasing force (Disselhorst-Klug et al, 2009;Ranaldi et al, 2022). However, several questions related to this increase remain unresolved:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%