The Influence of Texting Language on Grammar and Executive Functions in Primary School Children

Abstract

When sending text messages on their mobile phone to friends, children often use a special type of register, which is called textese. This register allows the omission of words and the use of textisms: instances of non-standard written language such as 4ever (forever). Previous studies have shown that textese has a positive effect on children’s literacy abilities. In addition, it is possible that children’s grammar system is affected by textese as well, as grammar rules are often transgressed in this register. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of textese influences children’s grammar performance, and whether this effect is specific to grammar or language in general. Additionally, studies have not yet investigated the influence of textese on children’s cognitive abilities. Consequently, the secondary aim of this study was to find out whether textese affects children’s executive functions. To investigate this, 55 children between 10 and 13 years old were tested on a receptive vocabulary and grammar performance (sentence repetition) task and various tasks measuring executive functioning. In addition, text messages were elicited and the number of omissions and textisms in children’s messages were calculated. Regression analyses showed that omissions were a significant predictor of children’s grammar performance after various other variables were controlled for: the more words children omitted in their text messages, the better their performance on the grammar task. Although textisms correlated (marginally) significantly with vocabulary, grammar and selective attention scores and omissions marginally significantly with vocabulary scores, no other significant effects were obtained for measures of textese in the regression analyses: neither for the language outcomes, nor for the executive function tasks. Hence, our results show that textese is positively related to children’s grammar performance. On the other hand, use of textese does not affect—positively nor negatively—children’s executive functions.

The impact of texting language on Nigerian students: a case study of final year linguistics students

“…Nothing in the results indicates that texting language improves students' writing, nor is there any evidence that shows otherwise. However, the results from Dijk et al's (2016) study show that texting language is linked with students' general grammar performance because learners analyse sentences to decide what to drop or use in which context. As such, they 'constantly train their grammatical knowledge and strengthen their grammatical performance' (Dijk et al, 2016: 17).…”

“…We further hypothesised that frequent SMS users may develop an improved skill in writing. This premise was based on previous research that has shown that texting improves learners' performance in vocabulary and grammar (Dijk et al, 2016) and literacy development (Verheijen, 2013).…”

2 B kreativ’ or not to be creative: Textisms and texters’ creativity

“…How original are each textim?). Moreover, it will be necessary in another study to add some standardized measures of executive functions (e.g., flexibility, inhibition and processing speed) as well as some control for the texters' level of vocabulary (Anderson & Reidy, 2012;Miyake & Friedman, 2012;Van Dijk, Van Witteloostuijn, Vasić, Avrutin, & Blom, 2016).…”

Outlandish Spelling System Invented by Indonesian Internet Society: The Case of Language Usage in Social Networking Site

“…But the process of normalization would be a little inconvenient for users of chatting software because they prioritize the practicality than the structure. Belal (2014) objected that bad spelling from social media provides negative influence since incorrect grammar and sentence structure in students writing can be affected by SNS. Nonetheless, SNS also has beneficial impact which was confirmed by Belal that SNS may help the students and also teacher to exchange ideas and to formulate group discussion.…”