The influence of porosity, crystallinity and interlayer adhesion on the tensile strength of 3D printed polylactic acid (PLA)

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to understand how printing parameters and subsequent annealing impacts porosity and crystallinity of 3D printed polylactic acid (PLA) and how these structural characteristics impact the printed material’s tensile strength in various build directions. Design/methodology/approach Two experimental studies were used, and samples with a flat vs upright print orientation were compared. The first experiment investigates a scan of printing parameters and annealing times and temperatures above the cold crystallization temperature (Tcc) for PLA. The second experiment investigates annealing above and below Tcc at multiple points over 12 h. Findings Annealing above Tcc does not significantly impact the porosity but it does increase crystallinity. The increase in crystallinity does not contribute to an increase in strength, suggesting that co-crystallization across the weld does not occur. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images show that weld interfaces between printed fibers are still visible after annealing above Tcc, confirming the lack of co-crystallization. Annealing below Tcc does not significantly impact porosity or crystallinity. However, there is an increase in tensile strength. AFM images show that annealing below Tcc reduces thermal stresses that form at the interfaces during printing and slightly “heals” the as-printed interface resulting in an increase in tensile strength. Originality/value While annealing has been explored in the literature, it is unclear how it affects porosity, crystallinity and thermal stresses in fused filament fabrication PLA and how those factors contribute to mechanical properties. This study explains how co-crystallization across weld interfaces is necessary for crystallinity to increase strength and uses AFM as a technique to observe morphology at the weld.

Fabrication of 3D Printed Poly(lactic acid)/Polycaprolactone Scaffolds Using TGF-β1 for Promoting Bone Regeneration

“…However, it displays some limitations such as poor water solubility, and being frangible [19]. Owing to its good accessibility, PLA is currently one of the most broadly applicable biodegradable polymers for various uses in packaging, electronic industries, automotive industries, and prosthesis fabrication, substituting effectively for petroleum-based polymers [20,21]. Many trends in orthopedic practice and research have suggested that PLA is safe and nontoxic [22].…”

Effect of Architected Structural Members on the Viscoelastic Response of 3D Printed Simple Cubic Lattice Structures

“…Several authors have extensively studied the manufacturing of PLA using MEX process such an in-process monitoring of temperature evolution, multiscale damage and fatigue modeling of PLA [ 46 , 47 , 48 ]. The influence of process parameters has also been investigated on the mechanical properties [ 49 ], impact resistance properties [ 50 ] and interlayer adhesion on the tensile strength of 3D printed PLA [ 51 ].…”

Deposition of Biocompatible Polymers by 3D Printing (FDM) on Titanium Alloy

“…Therefore, the printed specimens acted similarly to the natural lubrication mechanism of the meniscus. The porosity of FDM prints has been studied by other authors, although in the context of mechanical properties rather than tribological properties [36][37][38]. Moreover, the porosity of 3D prints is seen as a great chance to produce scaffolds that promote tissue growth [39][40][41].…”