2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of matrix crystallinity on the mechanical performance of short-fibre composites – Based on homo-polypropylene and a random polypropylene copolymer reinforced with man-made cellulose and glass fibres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the composite materials obtained from PP and hemp, we can observe, on the one hand, an increase in the enthalpy of melting ΔH m, and on the other hand a decrease in the crystallinity as the hemp fibre content from the composite decreased. Regarding the enthalpy of crystallisation, the higher the degree of crystallinity of the composite material, the higher the amount of heat released [ 53 , 54 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the composite materials obtained from PP and hemp, we can observe, on the one hand, an increase in the enthalpy of melting ΔH m, and on the other hand a decrease in the crystallinity as the hemp fibre content from the composite decreased. Regarding the enthalpy of crystallisation, the higher the degree of crystallinity of the composite material, the higher the amount of heat released [ 53 , 54 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their ductility is also not reduced as they all break at around ~30% of strain. This gain can be attributed to reduced creep by the presence of HNT nanoclay or increased crystallinity owing to the nucleating effect of HNTs [ 28 , 29 , 30 ]. However, further addition of HNTs diminished the gain and for 10 vol.% content of HNTs, the tensile strength is even reduced by 7%, while the strain to break is reduced to 2.8%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reduced by 5%, 14%, 18%, and 56% for nanocomposites with 1, 2, 5, and 10 vol.% of HNTs, respectively. Although, in some cases, the nanofillers improve the impact strength by increased crystallinity or a favorable change in crystal morphology [ 28 ], as well as other mechanisms reducing microcracking [ 31 , 32 ], their high modulus combined with low aspect ratio may also lead to reduction in impact strength, as in the case of reinforcing with fillers of higher magnitude [ 26 , 27 ]. In turn, reinforcing the PP matrix with short kenaf fibers gives ample rise of notched impact strength by 29%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 17 ] On the contrary, as a promising alternative material, polypropylene random copolymer (PPR), obtained from random copolymerization of propylene with a few ethylene monomers, is considered to be an ideal matrix to produce high‐toughness fiber composites. [ 18,19 ] This attributes that the homopolymer sequences are crystallizable to form a compound bi‐phase containing crystalline and amorphous phases, while the propylene‐ethylene random segments tend to form rubbery phases. [ 20 ] Thus, this multiphase polyolefin system endows PPR with excellent rigidity‐toughness balance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these studies only discussed the influence of nanomaterials on the crystallization temperature when discussing the influence of nanomaterials on the crystallization behavior of the PPR matrix; moreover, they did not only reveal the changes in the size distribution of crystallites from the perspective of crystallization and nucleation mechanisms, but also did not establish the relationship between crystallization parameters and mechanical properties. Besides, even though in glass fiber‐reinforced PPR systems, such as PPR/GF(80/20,60/40), [ 31 ] PPR/GF(75/25), [ 18 ] PPR/GF(40/60), [ 12 ] they only proved that PPR composites had better toughness than iPP composites, but did not further improve the toughness by adding β ‐NA. Therefore, the role of glass fiber alone or together with the β ‐NA in the crystallization process of the PPR matrix is still unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%