2020
DOI: 10.1080/00439339.2020.1789023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of light of different wavelengths on laying hen production and egg quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is supported by no significant impacts of UVA/B radiation on oviposition in young sexually mature laying hens (Lewis et al, 2000b) and no impact of natural light exposure on sexual maturity compared with pullets exposed to red light wavelengths (Gongruttananun, 2011). Furthermore, there is limited evidence for effects of UVA and/or UVB supplementation on egg production and egg quality during the laying cycle as summarized in Table 3 and previously reviewed in England and Ruhnke (2020). Across different strains of laying hens, several studies have supplemented with UVA (prototype UV LED bulbs, fluorescent bulbs, or insect light traps), or natural daylight and found no significant impact on egg production, performance, and egg quality traits including egg weight, eggshell breaking strength, eggshell thickness, albumen height, albumen weight, yolk color, yolk height and Haugh units compared with standard lighting (Hogsette et al, 1997;Gongruttananun, 2011;Sobotik et al, 2020;Spindler et al, 2020).…”
Section: Egg Production and Egg Qualitymentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is supported by no significant impacts of UVA/B radiation on oviposition in young sexually mature laying hens (Lewis et al, 2000b) and no impact of natural light exposure on sexual maturity compared with pullets exposed to red light wavelengths (Gongruttananun, 2011). Furthermore, there is limited evidence for effects of UVA and/or UVB supplementation on egg production and egg quality during the laying cycle as summarized in Table 3 and previously reviewed in England and Ruhnke (2020). Across different strains of laying hens, several studies have supplemented with UVA (prototype UV LED bulbs, fluorescent bulbs, or insect light traps), or natural daylight and found no significant impact on egg production, performance, and egg quality traits including egg weight, eggshell breaking strength, eggshell thickness, albumen height, albumen weight, yolk color, yolk height and Haugh units compared with standard lighting (Hogsette et al, 1997;Gongruttananun, 2011;Sobotik et al, 2020;Spindler et al, 2020).…”
Section: Egg Production and Egg Qualitymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…With consumers driving improvements in animal welfare, housing systems must cater to bird needs as well as being sustainable, thus requiring environmental optimization. The provision of UV light has garnered increasing interest with recent reviews highlighting the potential benefits for extending the commercial hen laying cycle (England and Ruhnke, 2020), and for enhancing vitamin D content in eggs for human health (Barnkob et al, 2020). Access to UV light is also more natural for poultry which may align with consumers' views that a more "natural" environment is better for bird welfare (Schröder and McEachern, 2004;Vanhonacker and Verbeke, 2014;Pettersson et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Birds can perceive colored light (400-700 nm) as well as the ultraviolet (UV) portion of the spectrum (100-400 nm) due to the presence of external retinal cones in their eyes [63]. Light colors may affect poultry behaviors, well-being, and performance and produce different results.…”
Section: Light Color/wavelengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have confirmed that pullets exposed to longer wavelengths of light (LWL, red/yellow/orange) have increased egg production later in life compared to shorter wavelengths of light (SWL, blue/green) although responses may vary depending on bird strain and the intensity of the light used [63,65]. In addition, it was monitored that folliclestimulating hormone (FSH) concentration, ovarian weight, and follicle number increased in hens raised under LWL [66].…”
Section: Light Color/wavelengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successive clutches are separated by one or more days of pause. The length and number of clutches are controlled by the ovulatory cycle, directly observed by the oviposition cycle, and governed by the circadian rhythm and the internal cycle of follicular growth and maturation [ 7 , 8 ]. Egg-laying can be characterized by two temporal oviposition traits: oviposition time and oviposition interval (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%