2020
DOI: 10.2174/1871520620666191231161227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of Different Spacers on Biological Profile of Peptide Radiopharmaceuticals for Diagnosis and Therapy of Human Cancers

Abstract: Background: Cancer is the leading cause of death worldwide. Early detection can reduce the disadvantageous effects of diseases and the mortality in cancer. Nuclear medicine is a powerful tool that has the ability to diagnose malignancy without harming normal tissues. In recent years, radiolabeled peptides have been investigated as potent agents for cancer detection. Therefore, it is necessary to modify radiopeptides in order to achieve more effective agents. Objective: This review describes modifications in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 66 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct labeling is a simple procedure, but some drawbacks regarding lack of specificity and poor in vivo stability have limited its applicability, whereas indirect labeling with bifunctional chelating agents overcomes these difficulties in the preparation of the 99m Tc‐labeled peptides (Rezazadeh & Sadeghzadeh, 2019). Since adding a chelating moiety and a radionuclide may affect receptor‐binding affinity of the peptide, a spacer is used to keep the chelator away from the bioactive domain (Farahani, Maleki, & Sadeghzadeh, 2019). In 2004, Okarvi examined a N 3 S chelate system for labeling an analog of αM2 peptide with 99m Tc through a triproline (Pro 3 ) residue as a spacer for detection of breast carcinoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct labeling is a simple procedure, but some drawbacks regarding lack of specificity and poor in vivo stability have limited its applicability, whereas indirect labeling with bifunctional chelating agents overcomes these difficulties in the preparation of the 99m Tc‐labeled peptides (Rezazadeh & Sadeghzadeh, 2019). Since adding a chelating moiety and a radionuclide may affect receptor‐binding affinity of the peptide, a spacer is used to keep the chelator away from the bioactive domain (Farahani, Maleki, & Sadeghzadeh, 2019). In 2004, Okarvi examined a N 3 S chelate system for labeling an analog of αM2 peptide with 99m Tc through a triproline (Pro 3 ) residue as a spacer for detection of breast carcinoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%