1982
DOI: 10.1016/0301-6226(82)90004-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of crude fibre from cereals on the net energy value of diets for growth in pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The digestibility of crude protein (Table 3) increased as the percentage of ash and fibre decreased, which is in agreement with published data (e.g. Just, 1980;1982). In feed H it was on average 2.5% higher (P^0.05) than in feed L.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The digestibility of crude protein (Table 3) increased as the percentage of ash and fibre decreased, which is in agreement with published data (e.g. Just, 1980;1982). In feed H it was on average 2.5% higher (P^0.05) than in feed L.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…At present, there is enough evidence that fibre can affect carcass composition of pigs (Bach Knudsen 2011). In agreement with our findings, Just (1982Just ( , 1984 found lighter BW and carcass weight for pigs fed greater amounts of fibre. However, current results were in contrast with previous data reporting no effects of the starch type and fibre level on pig carcass characteristics (Prandini, Sigolo, Giuberti, et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The decrease in digestibility of CP, OM and GE in relation to crude fibre content of dietary DM was lower than the results reported by Just, who used barley straw meal (Just, 1982b) and wheat and oat bran meals (Just, 1982a) to increase dietary fibre content in different diets. Dietary concentrations of the amino acids in relation to the estimated contents of ME in diets 8WSM and 16WSM were 99 and 98%, respectively, of that in the 0WSM diet, but in terms of faecal digestibility the ratio was only 92 and 89%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%