The Influence of Bone Thickness on Facial Marginal Bone Response: Stage 1 Placement Through Stage 2 Uncovering

Spray, J. Robert; Black, C. Gary; Morris, Harold F.; Ochi, Shigeru

doi:10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.119

Cited by 453 publications

(420 citation statements)

References 13 publications

(9 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

368

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Spray et al [32], with a study conducted on the analysis of peri-implant bone values, mea-sured over 3,061 implants and have come to the same conclusion as well. With a vestibular cortical bone thickness greater than 1.8 mm, there is a reduced buccal/palatal thickness, compared to other sites with a thinner cortical bone.…”

Section: Vertical and Horizontal Bone Resorption Following Immediate mentioning

confidence: 61%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Factors Influencing Immediate Maxillary Dental Implant Placement and Bone Resorption: A Review of the Literature and an Outlook on the Clinical Possibilities

Bianco¹

2016

Dent. Med. Probl.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The insertion of dental implants immediately after teeth extractions has become a routine clinical procedure in implant dentistry, despite difficulties derived from several factors influencing bone resorption. The aim of this study is to evaluate the survival rate of implant positioned immediately after tooth extraction in the upper maxilla and to analyze the surgical techniques and the parameters to minimize physiological bone resorption. An electronic search in MEDLINE (PubMed) and the Cochrane library was performed to analyze the factors that may influence physiological bone resorption during immediate implant placement: surgical technique, position of the implant and bone grafting. Immediate implant placement is a predictable technique with a high success rate. It does not prevent bone resorption subsequent to tooth extraction, but there are some parameters to take into account to minimize the bone resorption itself. Despite the high survival rate, more long-term studies are necessary to evaluate the success of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets in the upper maxillary. Special attention has to be given to aesthetic outcomes (Dent. Med. Probl. 2016, 53, 3, 408-412).

show abstract

Section: Vertical and Horizontal Bone Resorption Following Immediate mentioning

confidence: 61%

“…From a statistical point of view, it can be said that 1.8 mm is the critical thickness of the cortical bone, below which the operator should expect greater crestal bone resorption [32].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors Influencing Immediate Maxillary Dental Implant Placement and Bone Resorption: A Review of the Literature and an Outlook on the Clinical Possibilities

Bianco¹

2016

Dent. Med. Probl.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Additional factors are loss secondary to aggression such as mucoperiosteal flap raising, second-stage surgery for exposing the screw, and colonization by bacteria belonging to the oral flora at the coronal bone and implant junction (17,19). Other authors have also studied crestal bone loss and its relationship to the facial bone thickness of the patient (20). In numerical terms, bone loss in two-stage implantsupported restorations is estimated to be 1.5-2mm below the implant-abutment junction, exposing one or two threads after one year supporting a prosthetic restoration.…”

Section: Influence Upon Bone Crestal Levelmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In numerical terms, bone loss in two-stage implantsupported restorations is estimated to be 1.5-2mm below the implant-abutment junction, exposing one or two threads after one year supporting a prosthetic restoration. In general, this exposure of the implant body is not regarded as a sign of failure (20). However, in the studies on platform switching involving a follow-up period of 4-169 months, the reported bone loss varies between 0.05-1.4 mm (Table 1) (21).…”

Section: Influence Upon Bone Crestal Levelmentioning

confidence: 99%

The influence of platform switching in dental implants. A literature review

Serrano-Sánchez¹,

Calvo-Guirado²,

Manzanera-Pastor³

et al. 2011

Med Oral

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The platform switching concept involves the reduction of the restoration abutment diameter with respect to the diameter of the dental implant. In 1991, dental implants of 5 and 6 mm diameter platforms were introduced. However, matching-diameter prosthetic abutments were not available. These implants were restored with "standard"-diameter prosthetic components (4,1 mm). Long-term follow up around these wide-platforms showed higher levels of bone preservation. In time, it has been called platform switching. The first case report applying this concept was indexed in MedLine in 2005. Materials and Methods: The aim of this article is to carry out a literature review of articles which deal with the influence of this modified platform in hard and soft oral tissues. All papers involving "platform switching" that are indexed in MedLine and published in English were used. Clinical cases, experimental and non-experimental studies were included, as well as literature reviews. Results: In our search, we found: 16 clinical series or single clinical cases, 10 test and control studies, 9 experimental studies and 3 reviews. Conclusion: All papers written by different researchers show an improvement in perimplant bone preservation. Further long-term studies are necessary to confirm these results. The articles consulted refer to the biomechanical behavior of the abutment-implant complex in response to occlusal loading, the maintenance of crestal bone height and the peculiar repositioning of the biological space.

show abstract

“…The present case report showed that careful surgical and restorative interdisciplinary planning, along with the inclusion of the laboratory technician in decision-making and excellent motivation of the patient, resulted in a highly functional and aesthetic case as well as a satisfied patient. 7,8 Fig. 7 A PFM crown cementation…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Single Dental Implant Replacement of Maxillary Second Premolar

Alalyani¹

2017

jmscr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Replacing a single tooth with an implant has become a common dental procedure. Through diagnosis and planning including the use of diagnostic cast and cone beam computed tomography scan can help the surgeons to predict the final result prior treatment, and to help inform the patient of the potential result priorto perform any irreversible procedure. In the present case, the primary concern was the pre-surgical location of the implant in relation to adjacent teeth without orthodontic treatment or enameloplasty.

show abstract

The Influence of Bone Thickness on Facial Marginal Bone Response: Stage 1 Placement Through Stage 2 Uncovering

Cited by 453 publications

References 13 publications

Factors Influencing Immediate Maxillary Dental Implant Placement and Bone Resorption: A Review of the Literature and an Outlook on the Clinical Possibilities

Factors Influencing Immediate Maxillary Dental Implant Placement and Bone Resorption: A Review of the Literature and an Outlook on the Clinical Possibilities

The influence of platform switching in dental implants. A literature review

Evaluation of Single Dental Implant Replacement of Maxillary Second Premolar

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About