2020
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.13055897.v2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Inequities of Mental Health Research (IAMHRF)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the value of organizational support for community-based researchers cannot be overemphasized as it plays a critical role in increasing research productivity, especially in the area of mental health and cannabis use where there is a need for more applied research [3,16]. The MHCC's support for proposal development, facilitated through the 6 CBR hubs, led to the high response of 60 proposals received from communities and priority populations.…”
Section: Lessons Learnedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, the value of organizational support for community-based researchers cannot be overemphasized as it plays a critical role in increasing research productivity, especially in the area of mental health and cannabis use where there is a need for more applied research [3,16]. The MHCC's support for proposal development, facilitated through the 6 CBR hubs, led to the high response of 60 proposals received from communities and priority populations.…”
Section: Lessons Learnedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global underinvestment in mental health research is well-known, with several calls for action from both low and high income countries for increased funding and mental health research prioritization [1][2][3][4]. In Canada, mental health research grants are about ten times smaller when compared to the United States and the United Kingdom, and the majority of mental health research investments focus on hospital-related service provision rather than applied research with a focus on prevention [3]. In this research environment, community-based research (CBR) that is led by equity-seeking populations and centred in lived and living experience is often found lower down the list of mental health research priorities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to HICs, Brazil still lags in this area. This must be understood within the broader landscape of global mental health funding inequities and consider that 98% of all mental health research funding comes from HICs (Woelbert et al, 2020). A systematic review of the literature shows that mental health research in Brazil places a bigger focus on providers and work processes rather than outcomes and service users' perspectives (de Rosalmeida Dantas and Raimundo Oda, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research participation in low-and middle-income countries is further complicated by the enduring history of colonial legacies (Bulhan, 2015) and the geopolitics of knowledge (Naidu, 2021) that privileges Euro-American epistemologies (Mignolo, 2005), which materializes in science in multiple ways. These have multiple consequences: globally, more than 98% of all funding streams for mental health are awarded by HICs (Woelbert et al, 2020) who consequently occupy a privileged position with respect to knowledge production (Abimbola, 2019); representation of individuals who are white, male, and HIC-based working at academic places of power (e.g., editorial boards and universities) is disproportionate (Naidu, 2021). In addition, interventions developed in the Global North have been systematically adapted and implemented in the Global South, for example, the World Health Organization's mhGAP (Timimi, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%