1993
DOI: 10.1016/0028-2243(93)90023-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The incomplete cone biopsy: a comparison of conservative and surgical management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the rate of recurrent disease in patients with positive margin who underwent regular follow-up after initial LEEP was 17.6%, which was consistent with previous studies with a rate of 9.3% to 21.7%. [ 6 , 8 , 17 ] The difference in the recurrence rates with the literature is possibly due to the diversity in the definitions of recurrent disease and the various durations of follow-up. In our research, we divided the pre-LEEP TCT results into 2 groups: ≤ LSIL and ≥ASC-H, and by the statistical analysis we found that ≥ASC-H in the pre-LEEP TCT was a significant predictive risk factor for recurrent disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, the rate of recurrent disease in patients with positive margin who underwent regular follow-up after initial LEEP was 17.6%, which was consistent with previous studies with a rate of 9.3% to 21.7%. [ 6 , 8 , 17 ] The difference in the recurrence rates with the literature is possibly due to the diversity in the definitions of recurrent disease and the various durations of follow-up. In our research, we divided the pre-LEEP TCT results into 2 groups: ≤ LSIL and ≥ASC-H, and by the statistical analysis we found that ≥ASC-H in the pre-LEEP TCT was a significant predictive risk factor for recurrent disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some assume that follow-up protocol is the ideal way for management of positive margin, [14] while others prefer a second surgical intervention such as repeat conization or hysterectomy. [3,11,[15][16][17] As for the management of positive margins, both over-treatment and insufficient treatment should be avoided. [18] Accordingly, many studies have focused on identifying the risk factors for residual and recurrent disease in patients with positive margin, such as age, menopausal status, TCT results, HPV infection, and the pathological characteristics of the conization specimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 4 ] When positive margin exists, there are 3 management options: TCT, HPV, and colposcopic in close follow-up; repeat conization (including CKC and LEEP again); and hysterectomy. [ 11 , 12 ] The choice making is mainly influenced by the patients’ demand for fertility, age, compliance of follow-up, and the probability of residual disease. The probability of residual lesions and recurrent lesions is a focus of attention for patients and doctors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are 3 management options: thinprep cytologic test (TCT), HPV, and colposcopic in close follow-up; repeat conization and hysterectomy. [ 11 , 12 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%