1996
|
Sign up to set email alerts
The inability of physicians to predict the outcome of in-hospital resuscitation
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
11
4
3
1
Citation Types
0
15
0
0
Year Published
Range
1998
19982025
2025Publication Types
Select...
17
Relationship
0
17
Authors
Journals
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
References 0 publications
0
15
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…22,23 Although physicians could provide guidance regarding the likelihood of survival to discharge, a previous study found that the physicians' survival estimates were inaccurate. 24 Our study had several limitations. First, outcomes at the hospitals participating in the GWTG-R may differ from those of nonparticipating hospitals.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…22,23 Although physicians could provide guidance regarding the likelihood of survival to discharge, a previous study found that the physicians' survival estimates were inaccurate. 24 Our study had several limitations. First, outcomes at the hospitals participating in the GWTG-R may differ from those of nonparticipating hospitals.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 91%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Mean Injury Severity Scores (ISS) were 13.0 (SD 13.2) [interquartile range, [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Injuries included 19% penetrating injuries and 78% blunt injuries (Table 1).…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Previous studies have demonstrated physician assessment of patient risks and outcomes to be grossly inaccurate and biased. [26][27][28][29][30][31] As such, novel statistical techniques, such as machine learning, may help mitigate this shortcoming by minimizing user input bias. In the current analysis of Medicare beneficiaries undergoing a wide range of elective operations, we developed a novel machine learningderived Complexity Score.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important because previous studies have shown that physicians perform poorly when asked to predict patients at risk for readmission or other unfavorable patient outcomes. [26][27][28][29][30][31] Use of machine learning allows for minimization of this bias and maximizes the overall accuracy of the results. As such, the novel Complexity Score based on machine learning methodology improved upon previous iterations of risk calculators and should be the preferred method to identify and assess perioperative risk in the surgical patient.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…22,23 Although physicians could provide guidance regarding the likelihood of survival to discharge, a previous study found that the physicians' survival estimates were inaccurate. 24 Our study had several limitations. First, outcomes at the hospitals participating in the GWTG-R may differ from those of nonparticipating hospitals.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 91%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Mean Injury Severity Scores (ISS) were 13.0 (SD 13.2) [interquartile range, [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Injuries included 19% penetrating injuries and 78% blunt injuries (Table 1).…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Previous studies have demonstrated physician assessment of patient risks and outcomes to be grossly inaccurate and biased. [26][27][28][29][30][31] As such, novel statistical techniques, such as machine learning, may help mitigate this shortcoming by minimizing user input bias. In the current analysis of Medicare beneficiaries undergoing a wide range of elective operations, we developed a novel machine learningderived Complexity Score.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important because previous studies have shown that physicians perform poorly when asked to predict patients at risk for readmission or other unfavorable patient outcomes. [26][27][28][29][30][31] Use of machine learning allows for minimization of this bias and maximizes the overall accuracy of the results. As such, the novel Complexity Score based on machine learning methodology improved upon previous iterations of risk calculators and should be the preferred method to identify and assess perioperative risk in the surgical patient.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…22,23 Although physicians could provide guidance regarding the likelihood of survival to discharge, a previous study found that the physicians' survival estimates were inaccurate. 24 Our study had several limitations. First, outcomes at the hospitals participating in the GWTG-R may differ from those of nonparticipating hospitals.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 91%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Mean Injury Severity Scores (ISS) were 13.0 (SD 13.2) [interquartile range, [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Injuries included 19% penetrating injuries and 78% blunt injuries (Table 1).…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Previous studies have demonstrated physician assessment of patient risks and outcomes to be grossly inaccurate and biased. [26][27][28][29][30][31] As such, novel statistical techniques, such as machine learning, may help mitigate this shortcoming by minimizing user input bias. In the current analysis of Medicare beneficiaries undergoing a wide range of elective operations, we developed a novel machine learningderived Complexity Score.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important because previous studies have shown that physicians perform poorly when asked to predict patients at risk for readmission or other unfavorable patient outcomes. [26][27][28][29][30][31] Use of machine learning allows for minimization of this bias and maximizes the overall accuracy of the results. As such, the novel Complexity Score based on machine learning methodology improved upon previous iterations of risk calculators and should be the preferred method to identify and assess perioperative risk in the surgical patient.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%