2010
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of science content and professional learning communities on science teaching efficacy and standards‐based instruction

Abstract: This study examines the impact of standards-based professional development on teacher efficacy and instructional practice of elementary and middle school science teachers. Professional development activities were conducted over a period of 3 years and included content courses as well as teacher involvement in professional learning communities. Teacher efficacy was assessed at five time points using the Science Teacher Efficacy Beliefs Instrument (STEBI), and instructional practice was evaluated at four time po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
75
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(86 reference statements)
7
75
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, inquiry-based instruction is considered a major factor influencing elementary preservice teacher self-efficacy and outcome expectancy (Narayan & Lamp, 2010). Furthermore, changes in self-efficacy are positively correlated with changes in the use of inquiry-based instructional practice among elementary and middle school science teachers (Lakshmanan, Heath, Perlmutter, & Elder, 2011). However, students might not benefit from inquiry learning experiences uniformly (Avery & Meyer, 2012).…”
Section: Inquiry-based Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, inquiry-based instruction is considered a major factor influencing elementary preservice teacher self-efficacy and outcome expectancy (Narayan & Lamp, 2010). Furthermore, changes in self-efficacy are positively correlated with changes in the use of inquiry-based instructional practice among elementary and middle school science teachers (Lakshmanan, Heath, Perlmutter, & Elder, 2011). However, students might not benefit from inquiry learning experiences uniformly (Avery & Meyer, 2012).…”
Section: Inquiry-based Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Day and Gu 2007, p. 439), much like Coldwell (2017, p. 190) (cf. also Ross and Bruce 2007;Lakshmanan et al 2011); other researchers, however, suggest student achievement and progress as units of measurement. Avalos (2011, p. 10), for instance, indicates that the professional development of teachers involves "teachers learning, learning how to learn, and transforming their knowledge into practice for the benefit of their students' growth" (cf.…”
Section: Benefits Of Professional Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis described above follows the RTOP analysis described in the RTOP reference manual [47], previous RTOP studies [16,[49][50][51], and other educational studies [52][53][54]. While this method provides a succinct summary of the quantitative data collected during each observation, it overlooks a key feature of this type of data.…”
Section: Alternative Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%