The Impact of Regulatory Enforcement and Audit upon IFRS Compliance – Evidence from China

Abstract

This study contributes to the accounting literature by providing empirical evidence from China that adopting IFRS does not necessarily lead to IFRS-type accounting practices. We examine the impact of regulatory enforcement, in particular, an important Chinese government compulsory compliance policy implemented in 2001, and audit upon the convergence of Chinese accounting practices. Using a sample of 103 Chinese B-share companies between 1999 and 2004, we reveal that the decline in earnings difference between firms' financial statements under Chinese GAAP and IFRS is the result of the implementation of the 2001 policy and the audit committee which effectively control the firm's application of standards rather than the differences between the standards. The effect of audit committee leads us further to argue that the convergence of accounting practices may be affected by not only the lack of insufficient understanding of IFRS by local accounting professionals, but also the management opportunistic behaviour during the application of different standards. It implies that corporate governance may affect the convergence of accounting practice. However, we do not find evidence for international audit firms outperforming their Chinese local CPAs with regard to IFRS compliance. Therefore, the Chinese government should be cautious in promoting the participation of international audit firms in China for achieving IFRS compliance.

From totalitarianism to capitalism – the case of IFRS adoption in Vietnam

“…() noted that adoption of good accounting systems from external sources masks a nation's idiosyncrasies such as culture, local needs and challenges of implementation. We are called to be mindful that IFRS could be ceremonially adopted as a ‘quick fix’ or ‘window‐dressing’ without necessary changes in the supporting infrastructures and national idiosyncrasies (Belkaoui, ; Chen and Zhang, ). Cieslewicz () argued that change should not be expected to be as simple as adoption of codes or a set of standards.…”

China's Convergence with IFRS: Analysis of Dual‐listed Companies

“…Fourth, differences in accounting numbers under the two sets of standards are also influenced by the size of auditing firms, but consistent conclusions have not yet been reached (see Huang, 2003;Wang et al, 2004). Using a sample of 103 Chinese B-share companies between 1999 and 2004, Chen and Zhang (2010) reveal that the clear decline in earnings differences between firms' financial statements under CAS and IFRS is the result of the implementation of the 2001 policy requiring use of the same accounting policy and estimates to account for the same or similar transactions by the Chinese capital market regulator, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC, 2001a), and the audit committee, which effectively controls the firm's application of standards, rather than the differences between the standards. Distinct from the above studies using AB-share or B-share companies' data, Rutledge et al (2015) use AH-share companies' data from [2006][2007][2008][2009][2010][2011] to evaluate the level of convergence of CAS with IFRS.…”

Goodwill and Mandatory Disclosure Compliance: A Critical Review of the Literature

“…When IAS/IFRS were mostly voluntarily implemented, studies documented a high level of failure of rules, especially regarding disclosures (e.g., Street et al 1999;Street and Bryant 2000;Glaum and Street 2003). Recently, research has been focused on companies that must apply IAS/IFRS or other standards, namely the United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US-GAAP) (e.g., Sevin et al 2007;Chen and Zhang 2010;Tsalavoutas 2011;Verriest et al 2013). These studies, which analyse the overall implementation of various regulations, continue to show a high noncompliance with disclosure requirements and a substantial heterogeneity on disclosure among companies and countries.…”