2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.11.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of peatland drain-blocking on dissolved organic carbon loss and discolouration of water; results from a national survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
80
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is largely due to a lack of suitable data; most experiments examining the impacts of drain blocking have focused on changes in water table levels (e.g. Armstrong et al, 2010;Price, 2003;Wilson et al, 2010), but even these studies are limited in number. There are also methodological challenges associated with the measurement of flow following drain blocking; cases have been noted where the occurrence of drain flow is reduced by up to as much as 70 % following drain blocking (Worrall et al, 2007a) but this is just within the drainage channels themselves and not necessarily at a location that also measures water that might spill downslope from the blocked drains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is largely due to a lack of suitable data; most experiments examining the impacts of drain blocking have focused on changes in water table levels (e.g. Armstrong et al, 2010;Price, 2003;Wilson et al, 2010), but even these studies are limited in number. There are also methodological challenges associated with the measurement of flow following drain blocking; cases have been noted where the occurrence of drain flow is reduced by up to as much as 70 % following drain blocking (Worrall et al, 2007a) but this is just within the drainage channels themselves and not necessarily at a location that also measures water that might spill downslope from the blocked drains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decreasing sulfur deposition rates allow catchment soils to recover from acidification, where the resulting decrease in acidity and/or ionic strength of the soil solution may increase the solubility of soil organic matter (OM) and consequently OC leaching (4,16,17). Some studies have linked the OC rise to recent changes in land-use practices, such as the drainage and burning of peatlands (18,19), or to changes in land cover (20). Other proposed explanations are the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels (21) and the elevated atmospheric deposition of nitrogen (22,23), both of which support increased plant productivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial and temporal variability also influence how degradation features impact upon ecosystem services; for example, some areas may be subject to greater water table drawdown or experience more active erosion. This variability may also explain inconsistency in response to many restoration practices (such as Armstrong et al, 2010). Peatland managers may be able to use this variability to their advantage, by identifying areas that are most impacted by degradation and those which are more likely to respond to restoration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%