2006
DOI: 10.1080/13571510600784490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Non‐Normality and Misspecification on Merger Event Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these, perhaps the most interesting are those based on the bootstrap, which have been examined in a number of studies, including Kramer (2001), Hamill et al (2002), Chou (2004), Hein and Westfall (2004), Jackson et al (2006), Baixauli (2007), Ford and Kline (2007), and Corrado and Truong (2008). So far, evidence on bootstrap performance has been mixed and appears to vary with the type of problem to which it is applied.…”
Section: 'Brown and Warner' Methodology Studiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Among these, perhaps the most interesting are those based on the bootstrap, which have been examined in a number of studies, including Kramer (2001), Hamill et al (2002), Chou (2004), Hein and Westfall (2004), Jackson et al (2006), Baixauli (2007), Ford and Kline (2007), and Corrado and Truong (2008). So far, evidence on bootstrap performance has been mixed and appears to vary with the type of problem to which it is applied.…”
Section: 'Brown and Warner' Methodology Studiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The bootstrapped OLS critical values diverge from the nominal values of 1.96, which is somewhat expected, but are not far off (Ford and Kline, 2006;Jackson et al, 2006). However, the same cannot be said of tests based on t W and t N .…”
Section: Hac Ses and Merger Event Studiesmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…We estimate equation (7) using ordinary least squares with bootstrapped standard errors, which remain reliable even when the residuals exhibit heteroscedasticity, non-normality or time-series dependence (Ford and Kline, 2006;Hein and Westfall, 2004;Jackson et al, 2006;Kramer, 2000).…”
Section: An Event Study Methods To Identify Abnormal Returnsmentioning
confidence: 99%