2003
DOI: 10.1007/s10016-003-0030-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Introducing an Autologous Intraoperative Transfusion Device to a Community Hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Shuhaiber et al 10 noted that the intraoperative autologous transfusion device did not significantly reduce allogenic blood usage in a study that combined patients undergoing elective and emergency repair. 10 These results differ from our own findings, where in a combined elective and emergency setup, continuous autotransfusion was a significant factor in minimizing allogenic transfusion requirements. The mean overall amount of allogenic blood transfused in C.A.T.S patients of 4 U (range, 0-34 U) was significantly less compared with 9 U in the control group (range, 3-38 U; P = .0001).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast, Shuhaiber et al 10 noted that the intraoperative autologous transfusion device did not significantly reduce allogenic blood usage in a study that combined patients undergoing elective and emergency repair. 10 These results differ from our own findings, where in a combined elective and emergency setup, continuous autotransfusion was a significant factor in minimizing allogenic transfusion requirements. The mean overall amount of allogenic blood transfused in C.A.T.S patients of 4 U (range, 0-34 U) was significantly less compared with 9 U in the control group (range, 3-38 U; P = .0001).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…Because the cost of setting up the instrument for a particular surgical case is uniform and the cost of collecting additional units once the instrument is set up is minimal, this cost analysis may describe a cost for the initial unit transfused and then decreasing costs for each additional unit transfused or it may describe the cost when a specific number of units is reinfused (e.g., cost per 2 units vs. cost per 4 units). [27][28][29] Waters and coworkers 15 estimated that their ATS saved their institution more than $2.3 million over 5 years. In 2003, Glenngård and colleagues 27 found at their institution that an allogeneic transfusion of 2 units cost €454.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preoperative AT is contraindicated in cases with seropositivity, ongoing active bacterical infection, serious hemodynamic instability, a hemoglobin level <100 g/L and in a pediatric setting (9). Nonrandomized controlled studies involving aortic aneurysm repairs have been published, mostly reporting a reduction of transfusion volume with CS use and a decrease in the exposure to ABT (42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48). A meta-analysis of multiple RCTs has been published regarding the effect of CS use in elective infra-abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs found a near uniform reduction of ABT (49).…”
Section: Autologous Transfusionmentioning
confidence: 99%