2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2017.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of fecal sample processing on prevalence estimates for antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, although risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in the Arusha and Maasai were associated with multiple antibiotics, the few risk factors in the Chagga were only associated with one antibiotic, which increases the chance for spurious associations. The microbiology methods used in this study were the most practical given logistic realities, 28 but we acknowledge that identification of E coli by colony morphology only could lead to misidentification. In an associated whole-genome-sequencing project based on a subset of bacteria from this study, 9% of isolates from human stool samples presumed to be E coli were actually Enterobacter or Klebsiella species ( appendix ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, although risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in the Arusha and Maasai were associated with multiple antibiotics, the few risk factors in the Chagga were only associated with one antibiotic, which increases the chance for spurious associations. The microbiology methods used in this study were the most practical given logistic realities, 28 but we acknowledge that identification of E coli by colony morphology only could lead to misidentification. In an associated whole-genome-sequencing project based on a subset of bacteria from this study, 9% of isolates from human stool samples presumed to be E coli were actually Enterobacter or Klebsiella species ( appendix ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were then transported in cooler boxes with ice packs and stored under refrigeration for a maximum of 5 days until they were shipped to a reference laboratory at the regional hospital in Quetzaltenango where isolates of presumptive E. coli were obtained. Isolates were then tested for their susceptibility to ten antibiotics by using breakpoint assays 16,17,24 . For these assays, bacteria are grown on agar plates with fixed concentrations of antibiotic and they are considered "resistant" when growth occurs, or susceptible when growth does not occur.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colony morphology, while not a reliable diagnostic for species identity, was 99.2% consistent with E. coli based on a random subset of 248 isolates. We have successfully used this method for selecting E. coli in high-throughput eld [34][35][36]. In one study, whole-genome sequencing of 1,317 presumptive E. coli con rmed that 90.7% of the isolates collected from human stool samples were E. coli [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%