IEEE MTT-S International Microwave and RF Conference 2013
DOI: 10.1109/imarc.2013.6777697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of coupling on the reflections of cavity resonators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For best performance of the direct filter connection a codesign of the cavity bandpass filter (BPF) and the PCB output matching was done. The measured data of the cavity filter presented in [8] was used for the BPF, while for the PCB a Rogers 4350B substrate was considered. The resulting arrangement is depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Discrete Source Modulated Amplifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For best performance of the direct filter connection a codesign of the cavity bandpass filter (BPF) and the PCB output matching was done. The measured data of the cavity filter presented in [8] was used for the BPF, while for the PCB a Rogers 4350B substrate was considered. The resulting arrangement is depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Discrete Source Modulated Amplifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve the required matching network for best performance of the direct filter connection a codesign of the cavity bandpass filter and the PCB output matching was done. For the BPF measured data of the cavity filter presented in [9] was used, while for the PCB a Rogers 4350B substrate was considered. The resulting arrangement is depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Common Drain Parallel Amplifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BPF has its center frequency around 2.648 GHz determining the design frequency. Measured S ‐Parameters from the filter presented in were used for simulation.…”
Section: Design Examplementioning
confidence: 99%