2017
DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of Chinese competition on third markets: An analysis by region and technological category

Abstract: This article seeks, through the use of a gravity model, to verify if in the 2000‐2009 years Chinese exports have displaced exports from other countries in third markets. The contribution of this article is to provide an overview of Chinese competition, covering different regions and technology categories in a comparative way. The evidence shows that the effect of Chinese exports on global exports is mainly negative. The medium technology manufacturing sector is the segment most affected by Chinese competition.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(93 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, effects are higher in more traditional sectors such as textiles, clothing and footwear, but also are present in sectors of higher technological content, such as chemicals, machinery and electrical and electronic equipment. Modolo and Hiratuka (2017) found the same results for the world market, although the negative effects of Chinese competition in developing countries in Asia and in Mexico and the Caribbean were higher than those observed in South American countries.…”
Section: Recent Changes In China-la Economic Relationssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In general, effects are higher in more traditional sectors such as textiles, clothing and footwear, but also are present in sectors of higher technological content, such as chemicals, machinery and electrical and electronic equipment. Modolo and Hiratuka (2017) found the same results for the world market, although the negative effects of Chinese competition in developing countries in Asia and in Mexico and the Caribbean were higher than those observed in South American countries.…”
Section: Recent Changes In China-la Economic Relationssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…For the two LAC countries in the sample, a 1% increase in Chinese textile exports is found to decrease Mexican exports by 0.82% and exports from the Dominican Republic by 0.31%. Módolo and Hiratuka (2017) find similar displacement effects for the manufacturing sector from 2000 to 2009 using 2SLS with bilateral distance as an instrumental variable. Annual product data is aggregated to technological intensities following Lall (2000).…”
Section: Augmented Gravity and Export Competitionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Starting with Eichengreen et al (2004), these studies rely on augmented versions of the gravity regression, including Chinese exports among its covariates. Work so far includes analyses of the effects of exports competition between China and Asia (Athukorala, 2009;Eichengreen et al, 2004Eichengreen et al, , 2007Greenaway et al, 2010;Kong & Kneller, 2016), African (Edwards & Jenkins, 2014;Geda & Meskel, 2007;Giovannetti & Sanfilippo, 2009), and European countries (Elleby et al, 2018;Giovannetti et al, 2012;Stanojevic et al, 2020), as well as sector-specific applications that include individual Latin American countries (Lederman et al, 2007;Módolo & Hiratuka, 2017;Pham et al, 2017;Zeidan, 2015). Lederman et al (2007) examine the partial correlation between Chinese and Indian non-fuel exports and LAC trade with third markets between 2002 and 2004.…”
Section: Augmented Gravity and Export Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Triggered by China's rise in the world economy, various studies have focused on the Chinese trade expansion and its effects on other countries, examining specifically if Chinese exports have displaced exports of other countries in third markets. Even though Modolo and Hiratuka (2017) conclude that the effect of Chinese exports on global exports is mainly negative, their review of the literature shows that this conclusion had been disputed in previous studies. 4 The literature examining the impact of FDI is far less controversial than the trade literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%