2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of a carbon tax on manufacturing: Evidence from microdata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
140
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 286 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
140
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Most striking is the size of the effects: abolishing the exemption in contributing to this impure public good almost doubles the acceptance rate for a given burden, a larger effect than when quartering this burden. Our empirical finding that reducing inequity in the distribution of cost increases the acceptance of bearing these costs may have high external validity, that is, it may have far-reaching implications for policy-making in other fields where exemptions exist as well, for instance in carbon tax schemes (Bjørner and Jensen, 2002;Martin et al, 2014;Rivers and Schaufele, 2015;Yamazaki, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Most striking is the size of the effects: abolishing the exemption in contributing to this impure public good almost doubles the acceptance rate for a given burden, a larger effect than when quartering this burden. Our empirical finding that reducing inequity in the distribution of cost increases the acceptance of bearing these costs may have high external validity, that is, it may have far-reaching implications for policy-making in other fields where exemptions exist as well, for instance in carbon tax schemes (Bjørner and Jensen, 2002;Martin et al, 2014;Rivers and Schaufele, 2015;Yamazaki, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Although certain studies, such as Martin et al. (), attempted to address these concerns with natural experimental designs, proof of causality from more cases is needed to conclusively assess the effectiveness of this tool. More specifically, more studies are needed to focus on developing countries whose governments are engaging in practicing environmental taxes to combat their soaring pollution emissions as there are few restrictions (Cottrell et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They show that the tradable permit system yielded emission reductions of 20 percent in comparison to the counterfactual, where facilities were regulated by command-and-control regulation. Martin, de Preux, and Wagner (2014) evaluate the impact of a carbon tax on the manufacturing industry in the UK using an instrumental variable approach. They provide robust evidence that the Climate Change Levy significantly decreased energy intensity and electricity use, while the economic performance of the firms remained unaffected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%