2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The hyperelastic and failure behaviors of skin in relation to the dynamic application of microscopic penetrators in a murine model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To examine how mechanical application of stress/energy to the skin is transmitted and how it is linked with skin cell death, we applied a skin deformation and fracture model 17 to estimate the consequences of static or dynamic application of flat plate, pillar or cylindrical–conical microprojection array (Supplementary Figs 2 and 3). Using choices of energy and penetration data from previous work, we compared the spatial distribution of stress calculated by simulation with experimentally measured cell death in mouse ear skin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To examine how mechanical application of stress/energy to the skin is transmitted and how it is linked with skin cell death, we applied a skin deformation and fracture model 17 to estimate the consequences of static or dynamic application of flat plate, pillar or cylindrical–conical microprojection array (Supplementary Figs 2 and 3). Using choices of energy and penetration data from previous work, we compared the spatial distribution of stress calculated by simulation with experimentally measured cell death in mouse ear skin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic application requires an applicator to fire the array at a constant energy (3500, 5800 or 11,200 J/m 2 ) and the arrays are rested on the skin for 2 min, similar to the transcutaneous immunisation. The stress distributions were computed using the finite element model of the skin developed in Meliga et al 17 and were solved using Abaqus (Abaqus 6.11; Dassault Systemes Simulia, Corp., Providence, RI, USA). Specifically, the mouse ear was represented as a seven-layer material constituted by a 70 μm-thick cartilage layer sandwiched between the ventral and dorsal skin tissues having the following geometry: a 5 μm-thick stratum corneum (SC), a 15 μm-thick VE and a 60 μm-thick Dermis (D).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other more complex skin modelling approaches utilise finite element analysis (e.g. 51 ) which is time consuming and expensive. For many purposes, this model serves as an engineering tool that can provide estimates of the skin’s mechanical properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each Nanopatch™ was delivered using a custom applicator, PoP4 (Proof of Principle 4). PoP4 pushed the patches onto the site at a high speed (∼15 m/s) to ensure full engagement of the Nanopatch™ surface with the skin [40], [41]. For Nanopatch™ delivery studies, the PoP4 applicator is first attached to the Nanopatch™ with holder, the Nanopatch™ is removed from the holder, placed against the skin, and the plunger activated to administer the Nanopatch™ to the skin.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%