1996
DOI: 10.1515/9780691187266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The History and Geography of Human Genes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
164
1
9

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
164
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern is also found in thiopurine methyltransferase, where 9.4% of African American (Hon et al, 1999), 10.1% of Caucasian ), 10.9% Kenyans (McLeod et al, 1999 and 14.8% of Ghanaian subjects showed variant alleles compared to 4.7% of Chinese subjects (CollieDuguid et al, 1999). This supports the hypothesis that multiple selective pressures will have distinct influences within populations (Cavalli-Sforza, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This pattern is also found in thiopurine methyltransferase, where 9.4% of African American (Hon et al, 1999), 10.1% of Caucasian ), 10.9% Kenyans (McLeod et al, 1999 and 14.8% of Ghanaian subjects showed variant alleles compared to 4.7% of Chinese subjects (CollieDuguid et al, 1999). This supports the hypothesis that multiple selective pressures will have distinct influences within populations (Cavalli-Sforza, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…On the other hand, it may reflect the higher prevalence of SLE in Southern Europe 13 or represent a peculiar characteristic of Sardinians, which deserves further investigations specifically addressing SLE susceptibility, since the islanders show a fully differentiated genetic profile from other populations. 35 There are some limitations to this study. First, although population-based administrative data have been proved to be useful tools in SLE research providing reliable case definitions, 36 reliance on a single source such as HDR reduces sensitivity and does not account for inherent error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is in the top 7.40% of the European vs. East Asian null-distribution. Given the lower average F ST observed between Saami and East Asians than between continental Europeans and East Asians, based on classical markers (Cavalli-Sforza et al 1988, 1994, the European vs East Asian comparison is likely to generate higher values than the true null-distribution of F ST between the Saami and the Chinese for neutral loci. We also note that polarity of the difference in Pro11Leu allele frequency, with a higher frequency of the T allele in the Saami, is consistent with our hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Allele C corresponds to the AGXT major allele, encoding Pro11; allele T corresponds to the AGXT minor allele, encoding Leu11 (ANT Anatolian Turks, ARM Armenians, ASH Ashkenazi Jews, CHI Chinese, ETH Ethiopians, IND Indians (from Mombai), MON Mongolians, NIG Nigerians, NOR Norwegians, NOW North Welsh, SAM Saami)European/East Asian data sets is a conservative one. This is because previous studies of a large number of classical polymorphic markers(Cavalli-Sforza et al 1988, 1994 have shown that the F ST between Saami and East Asian populations are typically lower than those between continental European and East Asian populations. However, a comparison of the Saami/Nigerian Pro11Leu allele F ST against the null-distribution of F ST for the European/African American data sets is likely to be biased in favour of F ST outlier status for the Pro11-…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%