2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hip-spine Assessment of a Novel Surgical Planning Software Provides Acetabular Component Targets That Are Reliable and in Agreement With Current Clinical Recommendations

Emily I. McIntosh,
Nana O. Sarpong,
John R. Steele
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the presence of altered PT, relying solely on the transverse acetabular ligament becomes less reliable, as each degree of posterior PT corresponds to 0.7° of cup anteversion, resulting in inaccurate cup placement [ 25 , 26 ]. Because there is a loss of physiological pelvic adaptation mechanisms in the patient undergoing LA in standing and sitting positions, cup, and stem positioning might be even more crucial [ 27 , 28 ] and might be customized to specific patient anatomy and biomechanics to prevent complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in the presence of altered PT, relying solely on the transverse acetabular ligament becomes less reliable, as each degree of posterior PT corresponds to 0.7° of cup anteversion, resulting in inaccurate cup placement [ 25 , 26 ]. Because there is a loss of physiological pelvic adaptation mechanisms in the patient undergoing LA in standing and sitting positions, cup, and stem positioning might be even more crucial [ 27 , 28 ] and might be customized to specific patient anatomy and biomechanics to prevent complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complex interplay between spinal and hip biomechanics and the demonstrated superior incidence of THA dislocation in patients with prior LA necessitates detailed preoperative planning and a personalized, patient-specific approach [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Recent literature on surgical strategies fails to demonstrate any difference between the anterior and posterior approaches in terms of change in postoperative PT, as shown by Inoue et al [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%