2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17325.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The High Time Resolution Universe Pulsar Survey - I. System configuration and initial discoveries

Abstract: We have embarked on a survey for pulsars and fast transients using the 13-beam multibeam receiver on the Parkes Radio Telescope. Installation of a digital backend allows us to record 400 MHz of bandwidth for each beam, split into 1024 channels and sampled every 64 mu s. Limits of the receiver package restrict us to a 340 MHz observing band centred at 1352 MHz. The factor of 8 improvement in frequency resolution over previous multibeam surveys allows us to probe deeper into the Galactic plane for short-duration… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
323
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 348 publications
(326 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
323
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expected sensitivity limit for the SKA1-MID survey can be compared with, for example, the HTRU survey (Keith et al 2010) ongoing at the Parkes Radio Telescope and the Arecibo PALFA survey (Cordes et al 2006). Whereas the sensitivity for SKA1 50% would only be about half the sensitivity of the Arecibo PALFA survey (which, on the other hand, has a very limited sky coverage), it would still be significantly better than the HTRU survey by a factor of 2-6, depending on the Galactic latitude.…”
Section: A Brief Summary Of the Impact Of Early Phase Ska1 (50% Ska1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expected sensitivity limit for the SKA1-MID survey can be compared with, for example, the HTRU survey (Keith et al 2010) ongoing at the Parkes Radio Telescope and the Arecibo PALFA survey (Cordes et al 2006). Whereas the sensitivity for SKA1 50% would only be about half the sensitivity of the Arecibo PALFA survey (which, on the other hand, has a very limited sky coverage), it would still be significantly better than the HTRU survey by a factor of 2-6, depending on the Galactic latitude.…”
Section: A Brief Summary Of the Impact Of Early Phase Ska1 (50% Ska1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other major surveys are the HTRU-S (Keith et al 2010), HTRU-N (Barr et al 2013), and SPAN512 (Desvignes et al 2013) surveys at ∼1.4 GHz, the GBNCC (Stovall et al 2014) and AO327 drift (Deneva et al 2013) surveys at ∼350 MHz, and the LOFAR surveys (Coenen et al 2014) at ∼150 MHz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lone exception is the on-going High Time Resolution Universe (HTRU) survey of the southern sky with the Parkes multi-beam receiver at 1.4 GHz, which has covered the significant parts of the Fermi excess area. In particular, the low latitude component of the southern HTRU survey is making hourlong integrations with the goal of searching the galactic plane in latitude |b| < 3.5 • and longitude 30 • < l < 280 • (Keith et al 2010). HTRU has searched the direction toward PSR J1751−2737 but the pulsar does not appear in recent lists of detections (Ng et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%