2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.21.23295939
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The High Price of Equity in Pulse Oximetry: A cost evaluation and need for interim solutions

Katelyn Dempsey,
Mary Lindsay,
James E. Tcheng
et al.

Abstract: Importance: Disparities in pulse oximetry accuracy, disproportionately affecting patients of color, have been associated with serious clinical outcomes. Although many have called for pulse oximetry hardware replacement, the cost associated with this replacement is not known. Objective: To estimate the cost of replacing all pulse oximetry hardware throughout a hospital system. Design: Single-center survey, 2023  Setting: Single center. Participants: One academic medical center with three hospitals. Main Outcome… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the prohibitive cost of replacing existing pulse oximeters, 40 our work stands as a fundamental milestone to any interim solution that may tackle pulse oximetry inaccuracies leveraging existing technologies. If the finding that pulse oximeters are “more consistently wrong” among darker-skinned patients stands in follow-up studies, one could argue that clinical algorithms that perform a holistic correction – and not simple race corrections 41 – could be more attainable, due to the observed lower variance among darker-skinned patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the prohibitive cost of replacing existing pulse oximeters, 40 our work stands as a fundamental milestone to any interim solution that may tackle pulse oximetry inaccuracies leveraging existing technologies. If the finding that pulse oximeters are “more consistently wrong” among darker-skinned patients stands in follow-up studies, one could argue that clinical algorithms that perform a holistic correction – and not simple race corrections 41 – could be more attainable, due to the observed lower variance among darker-skinned patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%