1961
DOI: 10.1139/v61-159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Hellmann–feynman Theorem and Chemical Binding

Abstract: The advantages of the electrostatic interpretation of chemical bincling are illustrated. It is show11 that the forces exerted by the electrons in a molecular orbital may be determined by general expressions. These are functions of only one parameter, the value of which is easily specified for a particular case. From the genera1 expressions it is possible to obtain quantitative measures of the bonding or antibonding power of a molecular orbital. It is shown that the usual interpretations of bonding and antibond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A detailed comparison of the performance of three different codes, namely i) the Plane Augmented Wave (PAW) approach implemented in VASP, ii) the Full-Potential Linearized Augmented Plane Wave (FP-LAPW) plus local orbital (lo) method implemented in the WIEN2k code and iii) the Gaussian-type orbitals approach, gives similar results for different systems [18][19][20][21]. The charge transfers between the nanoflake and the AzPt were analyzed through a partial charge approach (i.e., valence electrons) in the Bader scheme [22][23][24][25]. According to this theory, the formation of a bond path is indicated by an accumulation of electron density, ρ(r), between the nuclei of the bonded atoms, which is necessary for bond formation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed comparison of the performance of three different codes, namely i) the Plane Augmented Wave (PAW) approach implemented in VASP, ii) the Full-Potential Linearized Augmented Plane Wave (FP-LAPW) plus local orbital (lo) method implemented in the WIEN2k code and iii) the Gaussian-type orbitals approach, gives similar results for different systems [18][19][20][21]. The charge transfers between the nanoflake and the AzPt were analyzed through a partial charge approach (i.e., valence electrons) in the Bader scheme [22][23][24][25]. According to this theory, the formation of a bond path is indicated by an accumulation of electron density, ρ(r), between the nuclei of the bonded atoms, which is necessary for bond formation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…* We have previously demonstrated the capabilities of the Hellmann-Feynman theorem in predicting reasonable magnitudes for the forces found in simple molecules (6). Moreover, its application gives a readily understandable interpretation of the forces operative in a molecule (7).…”
Section: The Determination Of the Density Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods described in this paper offer no advantages in the evaluation of this third The basis of the present method is in the use of the Gegenbauer polynomials for the expailsion of the radial dependence of the electric field about another atomic center. In both the two-and three-center integrals, gaz and gau are expanded about center fi (see are the incomplete galnilla functions defined by Equation [3] terminates after the first few terlns in any particular case due t o the orthogonality and recurrence relationships of the Legeitdre polynomials. In Table I we have listed the resultiilg general formulae for all of the nonvanishing penetration integrals involving s, P, and d atomic orbitals of ally principal quantum number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table I we have listed the resultiilg general formulae for all of the nonvanishing penetration integrals involving s, P, and d atomic orbitals of ally principal quantum number. The manner in which equation [3] reduces in a particular case will be illustrated for nFf n', I = I ' = 1 , and rn = nz' = 0. Consider first the two integrations over 0 in equation [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation