2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa2872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The H α star formation main sequence in cluster and field galaxies at z ∼ 1.6

Abstract: We calculate Hα-based star formation rates and determine the star formation rate-stellar mass relation for members of three SpARCS clusters at z ∼ 1.6 and serendipitously identified field galaxies at similar redshifts to the clusters. We find similar star formation rates in cluster and field galaxies throughout our range of stellar masses. The results are comparable to those seen in other clusters at similar redshifts, and consistent with our previous photometric evidence for little quenching activity in clust… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As detailed in Section 2.6, we follow the same method explained in Section 6.2 of Whitaker et al (2014) to calculate Hα SFRs from our G141 grism spectroscopy. We also overplot the Hα SFMSs from Figure 8 In general, it can be seen that the cluster star-forming galaxies in our sample are fairly typical, with an Hα SFMS following the field Hα SFMS (as also seen by many other works, e.g., Koyama et al 2013;Nantais et al 2020) from 3D-HST, which forms our comparative field sample.…”
Section: The Star Formation Main Sequence Of the Samplesupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As detailed in Section 2.6, we follow the same method explained in Section 6.2 of Whitaker et al (2014) to calculate Hα SFRs from our G141 grism spectroscopy. We also overplot the Hα SFMSs from Figure 8 In general, it can be seen that the cluster star-forming galaxies in our sample are fairly typical, with an Hα SFMS following the field Hα SFMS (as also seen by many other works, e.g., Koyama et al 2013;Nantais et al 2020) from 3D-HST, which forms our comparative field sample.…”
Section: The Star Formation Main Sequence Of the Samplesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…e.g., Koyama et al 2013;Tran et al 2016;Nantais et al 2020), stellar mass functions (SMFs, e.g., , metallicities (e.g., Kacprzak et al 2015;Tran et al 2015), kinematics (Alcorn et al 2016), and sizes and morphologies (Tran et al 2016;Matharu et al 2019) to coeval field star-forming galaxies. Furthermore, most studies in the literature argue for rapid environmental quenching in highredshift galaxy clusters (see Foltz et al 2018 and references therein).…”
Section: Cuts On Hα S/n and F140w Axis Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, Erfanianfar et al (2016), using data from the COSMOS, AEGIS, ECDFS, and CDFN fields, could not find any difference in the MS between field galaxies and those in structures in the redshift range 0.5 < z < 1.1, but a similar trend to that of Old et al (2020b) in the lowest redshift regime (0.15 < z < 0.5). On the other hand, Nantais et al (2020) could not find any significant difference between field and SpARCS (Muzzin et al 2009) cluster galaxies at a redshift z ∼ 1.6, which they explained either by the fact that galaxies might have been accreted too recently to show signs of quenching, or that the clusters might be not mature enough yet at this redshift to produce measurable environmental effects on these galaxies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…One of the ways to study galaxy evolution is to analyse the relation between SFR and stellar mass to check their location in comparison to the MS of star-forming galaxies (e.g., Elbaz et al 2007;Whitaker et al 2012;Davies et al 2016;Leslie et al 2016;Pović et al 2016;Elbaz et al 2018;Popesso et al 2019;Nantais et al 2020). The details on SFR and stellar mass measurements are explained briefly in Section 2, with more details given in Mahoro et al (2017).…”
Section: Main Sequence Of Star Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%