The Growing Price Gap between More and Less Healthy Foods: Analysis of a Novel Longitudinal UK Dataset

Abstract

ObjectivesThe UK government has noted the public health importance of food prices and the affordability of a healthy diet. Yet, methods for tracking change over time have not been established. We aimed to investigate the prices of more and less healthy foods over time using existing government data on national food prices and nutrition content.MethodsWe linked economic data for 94 foods and beverages in the UK Consumer Price Index to food and nutrient data from the UK Department of Health's National Diet and Nutrition Survey, producing a novel dataset across the period 2002–2012. Each item was assigned to a food group and also categorised as either “more healthy” or “less healthy” using a nutrient profiling model developed by the Food Standards Agency. We tested statistical significance using a t-test and repeated measures ANOVA.ResultsThe mean (standard deviation) 2012 price/1000 kcal was £2.50 (0.29) for less healthy items and £7.49 (1.27) for more healthy items. The ANOVA results confirmed that all prices had risen over the period 2002–2012, but more healthy items rose faster than less healthy ones in absolute terms:£0.17 compared to £0.07/1000 kcal per year on average for more and less healthy items, respectively (p<0.001).ConclusionsSince 2002, more healthy foods and beverages have been consistently more expensive than less healthy ones, with a growing gap between them. This trend is likely to make healthier diets less affordable over time, which may have implications for individual food security and population health, and it may exacerbate social inequalities in health. The novel data linkage employed here could be used as the basis for routine food price monitoring to inform public health policy.

Reducing meat consumption in developed and transition countries to counter climate change and biodiversity loss: a review of influence factors

“…In contrast, in some other countries meat is one of the most expensive food items in people's shopping baskets, so that eating less meat makes it possible to save money and potentially trade up to better-quality meat (Dibb and Fitzpatrick 2014). Rao et al (2013) and Jones et al (2014) stress that these relationships are too convoluted and underresearched for definitive conclusions to be drawn but should not be disregarded.…”

‘Neoliberal epidemics’ and public health: sometimes the world is less complicated than it appears

“… intense marketing by transnational corporations, which function as the 'vectors of spread' of 'industrial epidemics' (Moodie et al, 2013) as corporate expansion into lower-and middleincome country markets has been facilitated by liberalisation of trade and investment under the provisions of a plethora of international agreements (Popkin, Adair, & Ng, 2012;Hawkes, Friel, Lobstein, & Lang, 2012;Stuckler, McKee, Ebrahim, & Basu, 2012;Clark, Hawkes, Murphy, Hansen-Kuhn, & Wallinga, 2012;Monteiro, Moubarac, Cannon, Ng, & Popkin, 2013;Popkin, 2014);  the increasing unaffordability of healthy diets for growing numbers of people living on declining and insecure incomes (Drewnowski, Monsivais, Maillot, & Darmon, 2007;Monsivais & Drewnowski, 2009;Williams et al, 2012;Barosh, Friel, Engelhardt, & Chan, 2014;Jones, Conklin, Suhrcke, & Monsivais, 2014;Perry, Williams, Sefton, & Haddad, 2014;McIntyre, Bartoo, & Emery, 2014;;  and a disciplinary apparatus of health promotion (see below) that assigns responsibility for healthy lifestyles primarily to individuals, in effect blaming people for not doing that which is beyond their means for a variety of reasons. This is a function not only of income poverty but also of 'time poverty' and the exhaustion that goes with chronic precarity.…”

The double burden of neoliberalism? Noncommunicable disease policies and the global political economy of risk

“…Here as elsewhere in health promotion, the concept of empowerment can elide differences in circumstances of life and work, arising from elements of social structure, that mean some people have far fewer opportunities to lead healthy lives, and far less ability to make "healthy choices," than others. The simple unaffordability of healthy diets for poor people, including many of the working poor, in highincome countries is an important case in point (Williams et al, 2012;Ashton, Middleton, & Lang, 2014;Jones, Conklin, Suhrcke, & Monsivais, 2014).…”