approaches combined with modeling were the predominantly discussed tools. In addition, the meeting featured efforts to combine several disciplines in order to address questions concerning growth, morphogenesis and patterning from a dynamic point of view. Talks were highly diverse, from ion dynamics and regeneration to cellular mechanodetection and transduction. In addition, numerous new conceptual advances in coupling physical forces and morphogenesis, as well as the development of novel technologies to study forces, were discussed. The researchers attending the meeting agreed that the combined use of modeling and imaging approaches is key to ensuring the quality of measurements and the validity of the models developed using these measurements. Another emerging theme was the importance of the physical input and mechanical forces in developmental processes, as well as their interactions with the genetic program at work in the embryo.
The embryo gets biophysicalIn growing tissues, cells experience a mix of tensile forces and chemical information. Key to untangling the possible links, as well as the causality, between the two is the ability to measure and map the physical properties of tissues at the cellular level and characterize their biological effects. Overall, these measures need to be made using innovative technologies, the challenge being the ability to explore dynamics of developmental events.Clues as to how to address some of these issues were provided by Jochen Guck (University of Cambridge, UK), who studies the viscoelastic properties of tissues and their influences on cell behavior during central nervous system (CNS) development. His group has developed an approach using quantitative scanning force microscopy (through atomic force microscopy, AFM) to measure CNS tissue compliance. Owing to the heterogeneities of this tissue, glial cells and neurons can behave rather differently during their migration, as this process is mechano-dependant . To address the mechanical properties of tissues and cell behavior in response to their physical constraints, Guck's group created compliant polyacrylamide gel surfaces that are of varying stiffness that match or exceeds the stiffness of CNS tissues. They showed that, depending on their identity, cells will react differently to the stiffness of the environment: astrocytes and microglia will change shape if they are in contact with stiff substrates, whereas neurons will do so to a much lesser extent. Nevertheless, the migration of neurons is highly dependent on stiffness, as neurons tend to migrate towards soft tissue. By contrast, microglia move toward stiffer substrates. Importantly, astrocytes and microglia in stiff environments react by upregulating inflammatory mediators ). Guck's results show that the growth cone is also sensitive to its environment, as it retracts when in contact with the mechanical stimulation of the AFM probe. Guck suggested that the mechanical mismatch between neural implants and native tissue might be at the root of foreign body reaction and...