2013
DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2013.831536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Global South in Environmental Negotiations: the politics of coalitions inredd+

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This storyline perceives REDD+ as a North-South divider [60,61] and a new form of colonization [62]. It criticizes REDD+ as a cost-effective measure for the Global North in transferring the burden for carbon emission reduction to the Global South.…”
Section: Carbon Surrogacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This storyline perceives REDD+ as a North-South divider [60,61] and a new form of colonization [62]. It criticizes REDD+ as a cost-effective measure for the Global North in transferring the burden for carbon emission reduction to the Global South.…”
Section: Carbon Surrogacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So they had to use 2 more hours sorting the messy document back out (I17). REDD+ negotiations have been described by many interviewees as unique because (1) within REDD+, the forestry sector has an own negotiations stream (unlike transport/energy), (2) there are no formal alliances which characterize the negotiations in other UNFCCC negotiations, and (3) there is quite a high level of participation from both developed and developing countries (I8; Allan and Dauvergne, 2013). Several interviewees also commented on the wellmannered, informal and generally collegiate interactions between delegates to REDD negotiations (I17; I18; I23), even with progress being slow, disappointingly slow or 'brutally slow' (I6; I7; I20).…”
Section: Setting the Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 On aid there has been a shift from the traditional aid principles of the West towards a new set of principles, usually known as the Busan principles after a meeting held in that South Korean city in 2011. These new principles draw directly on the recent experiences of Third World success stories: spend on infrastructure and education, in order to boost growth, not on poverty alleviation or food aid; put central governments and the private sector, not NGOs, at the centre of aid delivery; allow host-nations to 'own' foreign assistance programmes rather than having to jointly design and manage them with donors; and transfer skills and technology, not just money.…”
Section: Creative Third World Diplomacymentioning
confidence: 99%