2011
DOI: 10.1017/s0043933911000249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The gizzard: function, influence of diet structure and effects on nutrient availability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
269
2
16

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 369 publications
(330 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
14
269
2
16
Order By: Relevance
“…It appears that the significant increase in relative gizzard weight was an adaptation mechanism to the elevated levels of dietary fibre in the LM 24 dietary treatment, as previously reported by Svihus (2011). A rapid and conspicuous enlargement in gizzard size was also observed by Zduńczyk et al (2014) in 16-week-old turkeys fed a high-fibre diet with 18% lupine seeds for 6 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…It appears that the significant increase in relative gizzard weight was an adaptation mechanism to the elevated levels of dietary fibre in the LM 24 dietary treatment, as previously reported by Svihus (2011). A rapid and conspicuous enlargement in gizzard size was also observed by Zduńczyk et al (2014) in 16-week-old turkeys fed a high-fibre diet with 18% lupine seeds for 6 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Structural feed components have been reported to be retained in the gizzard for a longer time (Rougière & Carré 2010;Svihus 2011;Meremikwu et al 2013). The high fibre content of the test diet which must have resulted in increased digesta retention time in the gastro-intestinal tract may be a reason for the lower feed intake observed in the present experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Feed form may also play a role in the digesta pH in the stomach. Svihus (2011) reported that average values in stomach pH for broiler chickens ranged between 3 and 4 for normal pelleted diets. .1 b ± 0.09 6.4 a ± 0.10 6.5 a ± 0.14 6.6 a ± 0.03 6.6 a ± 0.06 0.003 a-b Means within the same row that do not share a common superscript are significantly different (P <0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%