2015
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1510.05494
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The GENIE Neutrino Monte Carlo Generator: Physics and User Manual

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
224
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(225 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
224
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each change is balanced by changes in other channels to make the overall fraction of events affected by FSI constant. Thus, all inclusive event distributions (i.e., those that are not sensitive to final hadron multiplicities and kinematics) are expected to be invariant under FSI model variations [54].…”
Section: Final-state Interaction Reweightingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each change is balanced by changes in other channels to make the overall fraction of events affected by FSI constant. Thus, all inclusive event distributions (i.e., those that are not sensitive to final hadron multiplicities and kinematics) are expected to be invariant under FSI model variations [54].…”
Section: Final-state Interaction Reweightingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is particularly interesting to note that the treatment of final state interactions (FSI) via a distortion of the outgoing nucleon wave function within the HF-CRPA model leads to significantly different predictions for muon and electron neutrino cross sections at low energy transfers compared to widely used plane wave impulse approximation (PWIA) models (which do not include FSI) [11]. In this paper we report the implementation of the HF-CRPA model in the GENIEv3 neutrino-nucleus interaction event generator [12,13] and evaluate how else it differs from other available CCQE models. Particular focus is placed on how the predictions differ between different nuclear targets and between neutrino and anti-neutrino interactions within the low energy and momentum transfer region where nuclear effects are most relevant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lalakulich et al [50] have suggested a constrain of 1.1 GeV ≤ W ≤ 1.6 GeV on the center of mass energy in order to avoid the double counting of events in the transition region, while Hagiwara et al [22] considers this limit to be 1.4 GeV ≤ W ≤ 1.6 GeV, whereas W > 1.4 GeV have been considered by Gazizov et al [51] and Kretzer et al [52], as the onset of DIS processes. Besides theoretical studies, in the Monte Carlo event generators like NEUT [53] and GENIE [54] these boundaries are taken to be W > 2 GeV and W > 1.7 GeV, respectively, for the simulation of neutrino events. The region of W ≥ 2 GeV and Q 2 ≥ 1 GeV 2 is considered to be the region of safe DIS or true DIS in MINERvA experiment [55,56].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%