Reintroduction Biology 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781444355833.ch11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Genetics of Reintroductions: Inbreeding and Genetic Drift

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
60
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
2
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The processes of song divergence we describe here are directly comparable to the genetic effects commonly seen following translocations, that is, a bottleneck effect relative to founder size and subsequent drift associated with population growth rate and age (Jamieson & Lacy ; Keller et al . ). Indeed, Lambert et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The processes of song divergence we describe here are directly comparable to the genetic effects commonly seen following translocations, that is, a bottleneck effect relative to founder size and subsequent drift associated with population growth rate and age (Jamieson & Lacy ; Keller et al . ). Indeed, Lambert et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The main criticism of intentional inbreeding is focused on issues related to: (i) purging efficiency; intentional inbreeding does not effectively purge deleterious alleles, because it reduces the effective population size, (ii) reduction of genetic variability and fixation of deleterious alleles; intentional inbreeding, with its associated reduction of the effective population size, could lead to the loss of adaptive variation and fixation of detrimental alleles (Keller et al, 2012). Although close inbreeding of related individuals causes a much more rapid initial decrease of heterozygosity than for minimization of mean coancestry, half-sib mating confers a variance-effective population size that is proportional to the square of population size (Crow and Kimura, 1970;Nagylaki, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inbreeding depression is particularly a concern in threatened species with small, isolated populations, where the level of inbreeding will slowly increase even when mating is random with respect to relatedness (Keller and Waller ; Keller et al. ). Intuitively, we would expect that the more inbred a population becomes, the greater the severity of inbreeding depression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the lack of evidence for purging in wild populations is often attributable to poor statistical power resulting from low variance in individual inbreeding coefficients, small sample sizes, and/or studies of short duration (Kalinowski and Hedrick ; Bouzat ; Keller et al. ). Inbreeding itself is difficult to detect in wild populations without detailed pedigrees (Pemberton ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%