2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3743-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Gene Ontology Handbook

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another way to map between reaction type and similarity groupings is provided by the Gene Ontology (Holliday, Davidson, Akiva, & Babbitt, 2017) which is used in many large resources to describe similarities in enzyme function. Here, enzyme reactions can be defined using the Enzyme Nomenclature Commission classification (Tipton, 1994), which defines enzyme reactions by EC number.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another way to map between reaction type and similarity groupings is provided by the Gene Ontology (Holliday, Davidson, Akiva, & Babbitt, 2017) which is used in many large resources to describe similarities in enzyme function. Here, enzyme reactions can be defined using the Enzyme Nomenclature Commission classification (Tipton, 1994), which defines enzyme reactions by EC number.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, of the more than 5,000 proteins that can be assigned to the BioB-like Level 2 subgroup (of the BATs domain subgroup 6), only about 3,200 can be annotated with that reaction based on the presence of functionally important active site residues. The remainder are missing one or more of the residues considered critical for performing the canonical biotin synthase reaction (Betz et al, 2015; Holliday, Davidson, Akiva, & Babbitt, 2017), leading to the assertion that a large proportion of enzymes annotated with the BioB function in the Gene Ontology database (Ashburner et al, 2000) have been found to be misannotated (Holliday, Davidson, Akiva, & Babbitt, 2017). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, it is possible to conduct a functional enrichment on a microRNA regulatory network and highlight the enriched GO terms associated with both the microRNA and the target genes [71]. For more information about how to browse, download and use bioontologies please see [110]. Identifiers: One of the major obstacles in merging RNA data is the choice of identifiers made by the different resources.…”
Section: Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nucleus regulates and coordinates vital cellular activities in order to minimize the deleterious effects of water stress within the cell (Fernández and Strand 2008). Gene ontology (GO) provides fundamental information on which particular mechanism or part of the cell the genes play a role GO basically groups the genes into three categories (Dessimoz andŠkunca 1984-2020). There are three fundamental processes describing gene ontology, namely, cellular component (CC), biological function (BF) and molecular process (MP) (Wood 2008).…”
Section: Identification Of the Candidate Genes Within The Major Qtls mentioning
confidence: 99%