2006
DOI: 10.1017/s1474746406003058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Future of Health Care in South Korea and the UK

Abstract: This paper discusses and compares the origin and development of the health care systems of South Korea and the UK from the end of WW2 and endeavours to compare outcomes. The paper emphasises the importance of war as a stimulus to the development of national health services in both countries and argues that there is convergence between the UK's nationalised NHS and South Korea's US-modelled capitalist system. Overall, we conclude that there is a possibility not only that the financing and nature of the Korean a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the operationalization of the existence of a gatekeeper might be controversial, we carefully take the results of previous research in this context into account. We follow Barros (1998), Okunade et al (2004), Matthews and Jung (2006) and Commonwealth Fund (2012) to determine whether or not a country has a gatekeeper.…”
Section: Theorizing Globalization and Healthcare Spendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the operationalization of the existence of a gatekeeper might be controversial, we carefully take the results of previous research in this context into account. We follow Barros (1998), Okunade et al (2004), Matthews and Jung (2006) and Commonwealth Fund (2012) to determine whether or not a country has a gatekeeper.…”
Section: Theorizing Globalization and Healthcare Spendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social solidarity, equity, and efficiency in financing system were greatly enhanced after the transition to NHI system through the integration reform in both Korea and Taiwan [12,16,28,30,31]. The reason of those improvements in the two countries' health care system may have been due to the integration of multiple insurers into a single pipe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1977, the South Korean government introduced compulsory health insurance for private companies with more than 500 employees. From 1989, the National Health Insurance has protected 97 per cent of all the population and Medicaid has covered the remainder who lack the ability to pay the insurance premium (Matthews and Jung 2006). The health‐care system in South Korea is characterised by an important role played by the private sector in health‐care delivery.…”
Section: Institutional Differences Between Health‐care Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…46, No. 1, February 2012 remainder who lack the ability to pay the insurance premium (Matthews and Jung 2006). The health-care system in South Korea is characterised by an important role played by the private sector in health-care delivery.…”
Section: Institutional Differences Between Health-care Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%