2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(00)90945-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The functional anatomy of intrinsic and phasic alertness—a PET study with auditory stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, dysfunction of prefrontal regions of the brain cortex has largely been postulated in OSA patients (e.g., [ 12 , 58 ] In a recent study by our group on attention deficits in neurological patients, those suffering from partial anterior circulation infarcts were found to be more impaired in all attention tasks [ 86 ]. Finally, it is worth noting that the cognitive control of wakefulness and arousal (i.e., intrinsic alertness) arises from a network that includes cortical and subcortical structures (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate gyrus, parietal cortex, thalamus, and brainstem) [ 72 , 73 , 75 ]. Overall, the present data are coherent with the idea that attention is a complex system of specific abilities highly susceptible to different kinds of damage related to both bottom-up and top-down neural mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, dysfunction of prefrontal regions of the brain cortex has largely been postulated in OSA patients (e.g., [ 12 , 58 ] In a recent study by our group on attention deficits in neurological patients, those suffering from partial anterior circulation infarcts were found to be more impaired in all attention tasks [ 86 ]. Finally, it is worth noting that the cognitive control of wakefulness and arousal (i.e., intrinsic alertness) arises from a network that includes cortical and subcortical structures (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate gyrus, parietal cortex, thalamus, and brainstem) [ 72 , 73 , 75 ]. Overall, the present data are coherent with the idea that attention is a complex system of specific abilities highly susceptible to different kinds of damage related to both bottom-up and top-down neural mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intrinsic (also called endogenous) alertness refers to the cognitive (top-down) control of arousal; it is typically assessed by simple reaction time to a visual or auditory stimulus without a warning signal. By contrast, phasic (also called exogenous) alertness is the ability to increase one’s general level of attention for a short period in response to a cue or warning signal preceding the target stimulus [ 72 , 73 ]. Vigilance involves maintaining a certain level of arousal and alertness during a long task in order to detect infrequent but relevant stimuli (such as those that occur when driving a car on a highway at night (see [ 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 ]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption that an accessory stimulus can induce such a process is apparent in several more recently published reports (5,28). The hypothesis does not seem to be parsimonious since it assumes that the organism develops a temporally specific preparation for responding but a nonspecific sensorimotor preparation for responding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A warning cue, appearing 100-1000 ms before the target stimulus (Weis et al, 2000) can reduce reaction time, and this performance advantage is likely related, at least in part, to a change in alertness. Analyzing the neural correlates of phasic alertness revealed a more extended activation pattern compared to the intrinsic alertness condition, with additional activations in the thalamus as well as in the superior and ventrolateral frontal gyrus of the left hemisphere (Sturm & Willmes, 2001).…”
Section: Descriptors: Alertness Fnirs Optical Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%