2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2016.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The free boundary Euler equations with large surface tension

Abstract: We study the free boundary Euler equations with surface tension in three spatial dimensions, showing that the equations are well-posed if the coefficient of surface tension is positive. Then we prove that under natural assumptions, the solutions of the free boundary motion converge to solutions of the Euler equations in a domain with fixed boundary when the coefficient of surface tension tends to infinity.Comment: to appear in Journal of Differential Equation

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assumption ǫ 0 > 0 in Theorem 2.2 (which implies a uniform bound from below away from zero by the compactness of Σ), however, is crucial. This is apparent from expression (1.1), but it is worth mentioning that allowing ǫ 0 to vanish leads to severe technical difficulties even in the better studied case of the Einstein-Euler system (see [18,24,36] for the known results and [13] for a discussion; in fact, the difficulties with vanishing density are present already in the non-relativistic case, see the discussion in [14,31]). In particular, if we were dealing with a non-compact Σ and had chosen an asymptotic condition where ǫ 0 approaches zero, the techniques here employed would not directly apply.…”
Section: Statement Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption ǫ 0 > 0 in Theorem 2.2 (which implies a uniform bound from below away from zero by the compactness of Σ), however, is crucial. This is apparent from expression (1.1), but it is worth mentioning that allowing ǫ 0 to vanish leads to severe technical difficulties even in the better studied case of the Einstein-Euler system (see [18,24,36] for the known results and [13] for a discussion; in fact, the difficulties with vanishing density are present already in the non-relativistic case, see the discussion in [14,31]). In particular, if we were dealing with a non-compact Σ and had chosen an asymptotic condition where ǫ 0 approaches zero, the techniques here employed would not directly apply.…”
Section: Statement Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is all sensible, but it is ultimately, at best, a general philosophy that can provide hints on how to deal with each particular set of equations. The point is that one cannot know how much of the linear behavior will be suppressed by the non-linearities (a case in point is studied, for example, in [26,27], where the particular form of the non-linearity plays a crucial role in guaranteeing that certain smallness conditions are propagated, which would not be the case for the linearized system).…”
Section: The Naive Linear Analysis and Its Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later Ambrose & Masmoudi [6], proved local well-posedness of the 2-D water waves problem as the limit of zero surface tension. Disconzi & Ebin [22,23] have considered the limit of surface tension tending to infinity. For 3-D fluids (and 2-D interfaces), Wu [44] used Clifford analysis to prove local existence of the 3-D water waves problem with infinite depth, again showing that the Rayleigh-Taylor sign condition is always satisfied in the irrotational case by virtue of the maximum principle holding for the potential flow.…”
Section: A)mentioning
confidence: 99%