2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11636.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The formation and gas content of high-redshift galaxies and minihaloes

Abstract: We investigate the suppression of the baryon density fluctuations compared to the dark matter in the linear regime. Previous calculations predict that the suppression occurs up to a characteristic mass scale of ∼106 M⊙, which suggests that pressure has a central role in determining the properties of the first luminous objects at early times. We show that the expected characteristic mass scale is in fact substantially lower (by a factor of ∼3–10, depending on redshift), and thus the effect of baryonic pressure … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
118
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(97 reference statements)
12
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Naoz & Barkana 2007), which is ∼ 2 × 10 5 M⊙ depending on the baryon streaming velocity (Tseliakhovich et al 2011). On the other hand, haloes at M > 3 × 10 7 M⊙ have virial temperatures exceeding 10 4 K, and can undergo Lyman-α cooling (and hence may be able to form stars, even in the presence of an H2-dissociating UV background).…”
Section: Order-of-magnitude Review Of Small-scale Structure Disruptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naoz & Barkana 2007), which is ∼ 2 × 10 5 M⊙ depending on the baryon streaming velocity (Tseliakhovich et al 2011). On the other hand, haloes at M > 3 × 10 7 M⊙ have virial temperatures exceeding 10 4 K, and can undergo Lyman-α cooling (and hence may be able to form stars, even in the presence of an H2-dissociating UV background).…”
Section: Order-of-magnitude Review Of Small-scale Structure Disruptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several previous works have extended this theory down to the post-recombination baryon Jeans scale [8,9]. Interest in direct observations of the high-redshift Universe via absorption in the redshifted 21 cm line [10] has motivated more detailed investigation of the clustering of baryons during the epoch between recombination and reionization [11,12], including the entropy and ionization fluctuations in the baryons [13][14][15]. A deficiency of linear perturbation theory is that it does not describe the collapse of perturbations to form bound haloes, although analytical models such as the Press-Schechter formalism [16,17] are often used to estimate the halo mass function and clustering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach can be described through their relative difference. If we approximately include only the dominant modes, this key quantity decays as [62] …”
Section: Baryons: Linear Evolution Pressure and Coolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To define it, we start from the regime of large-scale structure (i.e., scales too large to be affected by pressure, but much smaller than the horizon and the scale of baryon acoustic oscillations), where, as noted above, r LSS does not depend on k, and is simply a function of redshift. On smaller scales, the next-order term describing the difference between the baryons and dark matter is the k 2 term [71], and the filtering wavenumber k F and corresponding mass scale M F are defined through [62] …”
Section: Baryons: Linear Evolution Pressure and Coolingmentioning
confidence: 99%