2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The forgotten variables of DNA array hybridization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides platform-specific issues, which require experimental validation, reduced tiling densities may represent a platform-independent approach to efficiently capture long templates for NGS technologies that generate long sequence reads. Because of their lower diffusion rates and increased intramolecular base pairing, the hybridization of long DNA fragments to capture probes is expected to be inferior to that of short fragments (30 ). Use of a high tiling density for target enrichment may therefore produce a general bias toward shorter captured fragments, reducing the overall sequence read length.…”
Section: Reduced Tiling Density and The Advantage Of Long Read Lengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides platform-specific issues, which require experimental validation, reduced tiling densities may represent a platform-independent approach to efficiently capture long templates for NGS technologies that generate long sequence reads. Because of their lower diffusion rates and increased intramolecular base pairing, the hybridization of long DNA fragments to capture probes is expected to be inferior to that of short fragments (30 ). Use of a high tiling density for target enrichment may therefore produce a general bias toward shorter captured fragments, reducing the overall sequence read length.…”
Section: Reduced Tiling Density and The Advantage Of Long Read Lengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In bulk solution the reaction may be viewed as being second order where the rate is dependent on the solvent, length of strand and complexity of the sequence (Wetmur, 1991). For larger DNA sequences the time for hybridisation equilibrium (T 1/2 ) can be very long with T 1/2 for a target human genome being 41 days (Carletti et al, 2006). Even with shorter probe molecules the time required to reach equilibrium may be in the region of 1-2 days (Halperin et al, 2006).…”
Section: Thermodymanic and Kinetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA probes showed a more dramatic response to the ionic effect, and duplex formation decreased rapidly at rather high (150 mM) sodium concentration. Other factors influencing microarray hybridization signal include spot size (25), probe length and G + C content (2,26,27), target length (28), concentration (29) and complexity (30), labeling of target (31), temperature and composition of hybridization buffer (2,26) and/or stringency wash temperature (32) and buffer (Poulsen et al , unpublished data). Whereas signal intensities generally increase with probe length (2,29), there is an inverse relation between probe length and specificity (27,29).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%