2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.109836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Five-Dimensional Curiosity Scale Revised (5DCR): Briefer subscales while separating overt and covert social curiosity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
120
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
10
120
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It comprised 441 items concerning respondents' sociodemographics, the circumstances surrounding their transition to emergency remote instruction, personal experiences, behaviors, attitudes, feelings, physical and mental health, as well as their personality traits. Psychological constructs were measured with 23 short scales developed from IPIP items and inspired among others by in-depth analyses of Brief COPE (Carver, 1997 ), Life Orientation Test—Revised (Scheier et al, 1994 ), Five-Dimensional Curiosity Scale Revised (5DCR; Kashdan et al, 2020 ), Individual Adaptability I-ADAPT-M (Ployhart and Bliese, 2006 ), and Grit Scale (Duckworth et al, 2007 ). Due to the rather general nature of these existing questionnaires, which does not permit capturing more situation-oriented circumstances, we developed custom-made scales, single-item indicators, as well as open-ended questions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It comprised 441 items concerning respondents' sociodemographics, the circumstances surrounding their transition to emergency remote instruction, personal experiences, behaviors, attitudes, feelings, physical and mental health, as well as their personality traits. Psychological constructs were measured with 23 short scales developed from IPIP items and inspired among others by in-depth analyses of Brief COPE (Carver, 1997 ), Life Orientation Test—Revised (Scheier et al, 1994 ), Five-Dimensional Curiosity Scale Revised (5DCR; Kashdan et al, 2020 ), Individual Adaptability I-ADAPT-M (Ployhart and Bliese, 2006 ), and Grit Scale (Duckworth et al, 2007 ). Due to the rather general nature of these existing questionnaires, which does not permit capturing more situation-oriented circumstances, we developed custom-made scales, single-item indicators, as well as open-ended questions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. A. Litman & Spielberger, 2003a;and especially relevant Lauriola et al, 2015; but see also Mussel, 2010) or relate to personality traits (Kashdan et al, 2018(Kashdan et al, , 2020. One distinctive contribution our model makes is the explicit difference in the temporal dynamics of curiosity's two underlying factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Beyond cybersecurity, curiosity may well contribute to performance in many knowledge work domains similarly characterized by dynamic and novel information environments. However, construct validation and measure development research are still ongoing, such that the dimensionality of curiosity remains unsettled (e.g., Kashdan, Disabato, Goodman, & McKnight, 2020), and the potential utility of the construct in work settings in general, and cybersecurity work settings in particular, is as yet unknown. As regards the workplace, perhaps the best existing evidence is from Mussel (2013), who found that curiosity, measured using the Work-Related Curiosity Scale (Mussel, Spengler, Litman, & Schuler, 2012), explained significant incremental validity beyond 12 other cognitive (e.g., general mental ability, fluid intelligence) and noncognitive (e.g., Big Five personality traits) predictors of job performance.…”
Section: Individual Difference and Team Composition Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%