1978
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(1978)008<1016:tfadoi>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fission and Disintegration of Internal Solitary Waves Moving over Two-Dimensional Topography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
143
0
6

Year Published

1980
1980
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
143
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, such a critical ratio appears straightforwardly in the rigid lid configuration: if δ < δ c ≡ √ γ, then the interface wave is of depression type, and if δ > δ c , then the interface wave is of elevation type. This critical ratio is well known in the literature, and has led to many extended models, where a cubic nonlinear term becomes the major source of nonlinearity for δ ∼ δ c (see for example [15,18,20,21,26]). It is interesting to see that even if the respective polarity of the interface slow mode waves in the free surface configuration, and the interface waves in the rigid lid configuration follow qualitatively the same behavior, the value of the critical ratio is notably different.…”
Section: Polarity It Is Obvious That For K = λMmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, such a critical ratio appears straightforwardly in the rigid lid configuration: if δ < δ c ≡ √ γ, then the interface wave is of depression type, and if δ > δ c , then the interface wave is of elevation type. This critical ratio is well known in the literature, and has led to many extended models, where a cubic nonlinear term becomes the major source of nonlinearity for δ ∼ δ c (see for example [15,18,20,21,26]). It is interesting to see that even if the respective polarity of the interface slow mode waves in the free surface configuration, and the interface waves in the rigid lid configuration follow qualitatively the same behavior, the value of the critical ratio is notably different.…”
Section: Polarity It Is Obvious That For K = λMmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…We recover the classical KdV equations in the rigid lid configuration (see for example [14,15,26,33]). Following Section 3.2, one would obtain in the same way a rigorous justification for the KdV approximation, under the rigid lid assumption.…”
Section: The Models Under the Rigid Lid Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В работе Пелиновского [3], а также в последовавшей работе [28] изучалась трансформация солитона на донном уступе в рамках уравнения Кортевега-де Вриза (КдВ). При этом было показ-но, что при умеренных амплитудах падающей и прошедшей волн трансформацию на крае уступа можно рассчитывать приближенно по формулам Лэмба (2).…”
Section: трансформация поверхностных волн на донном уступеunclassified
“…Трансформация уединен-ных волн подробно исследовалась в работе Пелиновского с соавторами [29]. Как и в более ранних работах [3,28], авторы использовали линейную теорию для расчета амплитуд трансформирован-ных над уступом волн, используя формулы Лэмба (2). Для подтверждения выводов теории были выполнены расчеты динамики одиночной волны (солитона) в рамках различных численных схем: на основе уравнения КдВ, обобщенного уравнения Буссинеска, а также в рамках полнонелинейной модели Навье-Стокса.…”
Section: T G X T H T G T G H H X T X Tunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation