2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The expression of MUM1 in cutaneous T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…have described IRF4/MUM1 expression in only 2 of 10 cases of C-ALCL. Consistent with our results, more recent immunohistochemical studies have shown IRF4/ MUM1 and TRAF1 expression in 80-100% of C-ALCL cases(Wasco et al, 2008;Benner et al, 2009;Feldman et al, 2009).…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…have described IRF4/MUM1 expression in only 2 of 10 cases of C-ALCL. Consistent with our results, more recent immunohistochemical studies have shown IRF4/ MUM1 and TRAF1 expression in 80-100% of C-ALCL cases(Wasco et al, 2008;Benner et al, 2009;Feldman et al, 2009).…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Such data have also to be confirmed in view of the poor reproducibility of microarray profiling techniques (Marshall, 2004;Sherlock, 2005). Interestingly, CALCL did not bear gains at 6p25.3, a region containing the IRF4/MUM1 gene, which is highly expressed at the protein level in CALCL and CD30 þ CTCL (Wasco et al, 2008;Benner et al, 2009). Balanced rearrangements of the IRF4/MUM1 gene have been recently reported in CALCL and T-MF cases (Feldman et al, 2009;Pham-Ledard et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…It has been described in CD30 + T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders, including systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) and LyP. 29 Although some report utility in this stain for differentiating between LyP and primary cutaneous ALCL, 30 other studies have reported that it does not distinguish between the two. 31,32 The presence of CD8 + CD30 + LyP and ALCL in 7 of 7 cases suggest that it may represent an adjunctive marker for CD8 + lymphoproliferative disease.…”
Section: Immunohistochemical and Molecular Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%