2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2019.02.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The evolutionary game analysis and simulation with system dynamics of manufacturer's emissions abatement behavior under cap-and-trade regulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Liu et al [3] analyzed the impact of income inequality on carbon emission in the US and found that income inequality exacerbates carbon emissions in the US in the short term, while it promotes carbon emission reductions in the long run. Zhang et al [4] found that the probability of the manufacturer introducing green technology was negatively correlated with the cost of government intervention, and it was positively correlated with punishment by the government for the manufacturer’s speculative behavior. Considering both economic and energy goals, Ye et al [5] established a dual-objective programming model that integrated 3E goals with quota allocation issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al [3] analyzed the impact of income inequality on carbon emission in the US and found that income inequality exacerbates carbon emissions in the US in the short term, while it promotes carbon emission reductions in the long run. Zhang et al [4] found that the probability of the manufacturer introducing green technology was negatively correlated with the cost of government intervention, and it was positively correlated with punishment by the government for the manufacturer’s speculative behavior. Considering both economic and energy goals, Ye et al [5] established a dual-objective programming model that integrated 3E goals with quota allocation issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhu et al studied the optimal evolutionary path of low-carbon investment strategies and found that an incentive mechanism based on government subsidies is crucial to achieve co-investment, and effective action should be taken to improve the assessment accuracy and supervisory efficiency [ 54 ]. Zhang et al found that it is crucial to implement dynamic carbon trading pricing policies, and government intervention costs and fines play a certain role in promoting carbon emission reduction [ 55 ]. Shan et al analyzed the strategic choices and behavioral characteristics of carbon emission reduction activities among producers, consumers, and decomposers, and further discussed the influences and decisions of the players [ 56 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mahmoudi and Rasti-Barzoki [59] designed the contrast between government and producer under different scenarios by using a two-population evolutionary game theory approach. Zhang et al [60] used evolutionary game theory to analyze the impacts of government policy on the decisions of manufacturers and the dynamic tendency of cap-and-trade market. Chen and Hu [61] applied evolutionary game theory to examine the behavioral strategies of the manufacturers in response to various combinations of carbon taxes and subsidies.…”
Section: Literature On Evolutionary Game Theory and Its Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%